首页> 外文期刊>RGO - Revista Gaúcha de Odontologia >Resistência de uni?o e da microinfiltra??o marginal em restaura??es fotopolimerizadas com LED e luz halógena associadas a três modos de aplica??o de um sistema adesivo universal: estudo in vitro
【24h】

Resistência de uni?o e da microinfiltra??o marginal em restaura??es fotopolimerizadas com LED e luz halógena associadas a três modos de aplica??o de um sistema adesivo universal: estudo in vitro

机译:与通用粘合剂系统的三种应用模式相关的LED和卤素灯在光致聚合修复体中的结合强度和边缘微渗漏:体外研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: This study aimed to assess the bond strength and marginal microleakage in composite resin restorations, using the Single Bond Universal adhesive system associated with Ultralux (halogen) and Bluephase (LED) light curing units. Methods: For bond strength, 80 healthy human third molars were divided into halogen light (n=40) and LED (n=40), and subdivided according to the following application techniques for the adhesive system: etch-and-rinse (enamel), self-etching (enamel), etch-and-rinse (dentin), and self-etching (dentin). The teeth were subjected to the microtensile test and the fracture pattern was observed under an optical microscope at 40X magnification; they were analyzed by ANOVA, and Fisher and Tukey’s tests (5%). For the marginal microleakage test, 120 class II cavities were prepared in 60 healthy human third molars that were randomly divided into halogen light (n=30) and LED (n=30), and subdivided according to the following application techniques for the adhesive system: etch-and-rinse, selective etching, and self-etching. The teeth were thermocycled 2000 times (±5/55°C), stained in 5% basic fuchsin and sectioned for qualitative and quantitative assessments; they were analyzed by Kruskall-Wallis and Dunn tests (5%). Results: For the bond strength of enamel and dentin, the adhesive application with prior acid etching was better than self-etching (p0.0001), regardless of the type of light curing unit (p0.05). Etch-and-rinse showed the lowest microleakage values (p0.0001). Conclusion: Etch-and-rinse obtained the best results relative to the other application techniques for the adhesive system in both tests, regardless of the type of light curing unit.
机译:目的:本研究旨在使用与Ultralux(卤素)和Bluephase(LED)光固化单元相关的Single Bond Universal粘合剂系统,评估复合树脂修复体的粘合强度和边缘微渗漏。方法:对于粘合强度,将80个健康的人类第三磨牙分为卤素灯(n = 40)和LED(n = 40),并根据以下用于粘合剂系统的应用技术细分:蚀刻和冲洗(搪瓷) ,自蚀刻(牙釉质),蚀刻和冲洗(牙质)和自蚀刻(牙质)。对牙齿进行微拉伸试验,并在光学显微镜下以40X的放大倍率观察断裂模式。他们通过ANOVA,Fisher和Tukey的测试(5%)进行了分析。对于边缘微渗漏测试,在60个健康的人类第三磨牙中制备了120个II类腔体,将它们随机分为卤素灯(n = 30)和LED(n = 30),并根据以下用于粘合剂系统的应用技术进行细分:蚀刻和冲洗,选择性蚀刻和自蚀刻。将牙齿热循环2000次(±5/55°C),用5%碱性品红染色,并进行切片以进行定性和定量评估;他们通过Kruskall-Wallis和Dunn检验(5%)进行了分析。结果:对于牙釉质和牙本质的粘合强度,无论采用哪种光固化单元(p <0.05),先有酸蚀刻的胶粘剂均优于自蚀刻(p <0.0001)。蚀刻和冲洗显示出最低的微渗漏值(p <0.0001)。结论:在两种测试中,无论光固化单元的类型如何,蚀刻和冲洗都相对于粘合剂系统的其他应用技术而言获得了最佳结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号