...
首页> 外文期刊>Obesity facts : the European journal of obesity. >Weigh More, Pay More? Public Opinion on Varying Health Insurance Contributions among Divergent Weight Groups
【24h】

Weigh More, Pay More? Public Opinion on Varying Health Insurance Contributions among Divergent Weight Groups

机译:称重,多付?关于不同体重组之间健康保险缴费变化的舆论

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The prevalence of obesity and its related costs has increased over the past decades. In Germany, obesity-related costs are merely covered by statuary health insurance. Within the statutory health care system, the health insurance contributions do not differ between people with and without health issues, such as being obese. This study aims to investigate the public’s opinion about whether people with obesity should pay a higher proportional health care contribution than people of normal weight. Methods: We conducted a pilot study and collected thereof data of a convenience sample. In total, 179 participants who perceived themselves to be of normal weight (51.40% female; mean age = 32.46, SD = 5.74) were surveyed using a questionnaire. Within this questionnaire, the participants had to rate how high the proportional health care contribution for people with and without obesity should be. Moreover, we assessed participants’ antifat attitudes by applying the Fat Phobia Scale and the Implicit Association Test. Results: A paired t test revealed that participants suggest a significantly higher proportional contribution for health insurance for people with obesity compared to people with normal weight ( t (178) = 4.51, p 0.001). Logistic regression analysis indicates that people with stronger explicit (OR = 8.77, p 0.001) and implicit stigma (OR = 1.06, p = 0.018), and higher BMI (OR = 1.27, p = 0.04) are more likely to suggest an increased contribution rate for people with obesity. Conclusion: Although we found that participants suggested higher contribution rates for people with obesity, overall only one-quarter of the participants suggested higher contribution rates for people with obesity, whereas almost three-quarters of the participants did not distinguish the contribution rate for people with and without obesity. Moreover, we found that the participants called for higher insurance premiums for people with and without obesity. Therefore, future studies should consider giving more information about the statutory health care system or the health care contribution rate before asking participants about their opinion.
机译:背景:在过去的几十年中,肥胖症及其相关费用的流行有所增加。在德国,与肥胖相关的费用仅由雕像健康保险支付。在法定医疗体系中,有和没有健康问题(例如肥胖)的人的健康保险缴费没有差异。这项研究旨在调查公众对肥胖者是否应该比正常体重者支付更高比例的医疗保健贡献的观点。方法:我们进行了一项初步研究,并收集了便利样本的数据。总共使用问卷调查了179名自认为体重正常的参与者(女性51.40%;平均年龄= 32.46,SD = 5.74)。在该调查表中,参与者必须对肥胖者和非肥胖者的医疗保健比例贡献进行评估。此外,我们通过应用肥胖恐惧症量表和内隐联想测验来评估参与者的抗脂态度。结果:配对t检验显示,与正常体重者相比,肥胖者健康保险的比例缴费比例明显更高(t(178)= 4.51,p <0.001)。 Logistic回归分析表明,显性(OR = 8.77,p <0.001)和隐性柱头(OR = 1.06,p = 0.018)和BMI较高(OR = 1.27,p = 0.04)的人更有可能提示病情增加肥胖者的贡献率。结论:尽管我们发现参与者对肥胖者的贡献率较高,但总体上只有四分之一的参与者对肥胖者的贡献率较高,而几乎四分之三的参与者并未区分肥胖者的贡献率。而且没有肥胖。此外,我们发现参与者要求为肥胖者和非肥胖者提供更高的保险费。因此,在向参与者询问意见之前,未来的研究应考虑提供有关法定医疗体系或医疗贡献率的更多信息。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号