...
首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology >Cervical cancer screening: hTERC gene amplification detection by FISH in comparison with conventional methods
【24h】

Cervical cancer screening: hTERC gene amplification detection by FISH in comparison with conventional methods

机译:宫颈癌筛查:与常规方法相比,通过FISH检测hTERC基因扩增

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To assess the clinical significance of hTERC amplification for cervical cancer screening detected by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and compare it with that of current screening methods within the same group. Methods: A total of one hundred and nine women were recruited in this study. All of them had liquid-based thin-prep cytologic test (TCT), human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA testing and hTERC gene amplification analysis using interphase two-color FISH. In addition, colposcopically directed biopsy and/or cone biopsy were conducted for definite histopathologic diagnosis for each case. The optimal threashold of hTERC gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) were assecced by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. The results of hTERC gene amplification analysis were compared with the cytological analysis, HPV DNA testing and those of subsequent biopsies. Results: Among the 109 patients, 18 were benign lesion, 17 were LSIL, 66 were HSIL and 8 were invasive carcinoma of cervix (ICC). Of them, hTERC-positive cases were found in 0.0% (0/18) of normal specimens, 11.8% (2/17) of LSIL, 72.7% (48/66) of HSIL and 100.0% (8/8) of ICC, respectively. The positive rate of hTERC gene amplification was significantly higher in HSIL and ICC compared with normal and LSIL (all P < 0.01).The optimal cut-off point of percentages of cells with hTERC amplification was determined as 5.5%. Using this threshold the hTERC test reached a much higher specificity(94.3%, 33/35) and a relatively lower sensitivity(77.0%, 57/74) to distinguish benign lesion and LSIL from HSIL and ICC in comparison with HR-HPV test (51.4%; 91.9%) and TCT (74.3%; 81.1%). Area Under the Curve revealed that hTERC amplification test performed more accurately (area under the curve = 0.857) compared to HPV test (area under the curve = 0.717) and cytology(area under the curve = 0.777) to discriminate HSIL or higher from LSIL or lower. This study also found a significant positive correlation between positive hTERC gain and HR-HPV infection, abnormal cytological or histopathologic lesions (all P < 0.01) in patients with cervical diseases. Conclusion: hTERC amplification testing may be a promising adjunct to screen women for cervical precancer or cancer with high specificity and accuracy.
机译:目的:评估hTERC扩增在通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)检测宫颈癌筛查中的临床意义,并将其与同一组中目前的筛查方法进行比较。方法:本研究共招募了一百零九名女性。他们都进行了基于液体的薄细胞制备细胞学检测(TCT),人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)DNA检测和使用相间两色FISH的hTERC基因扩增分析。此外,对每个病例​​进行阴道镜下的活检和/或视锥细胞活检,以明确组织病理学诊断。通过受体原位杂交(ROC)曲线确定了通过荧光原位杂交(FISH)扩增hTERC基因的最佳阈值。将hTERC基因扩增分析的结果与细胞学分析,HPV DNA检测以及随后的活检进行了比较。结果:109例患者中,良性病变18例,LSIL 17例,HSIL 66例,宫颈浸润癌(ICC)8例。其中,正常标本的0.0%(0/18),LSIL的11.8%(2/17),HSIL的72.7%(48/66)和100.0%(8 /%)的hTERC阳性病例。 8)的ICC。与正常人和LSIL相比,HSIL和ICC中hTERC基因扩增的阳性率显着更高(所有P <0.01).hTERC扩增细胞百分比的最佳临界点被确定为5.5%。使用此阈值,与HR-HPV相比,hTERC测试达到了更高的特异性(94.3 %,33/35)和相对较低的灵敏度(77.0 %,57/74),可将HSIL和ICC与良性病变和LSIL区别开测试(51.4%; 91.9%)和TCT(74.3%; 81.1%)。曲线下面积显示,与HPV试验(曲线下面积= 0.717)和细胞学检查(曲线下面积= 0.777)相比,hTERC扩增测试的表现更准确(曲线下面积= 0.857),可以将HSIL或更高水平与LSIL或降低。这项研究还发现,在宫颈疾病患者中,hTERC阳性增加与HR-HPV感染,异常细胞学或组织病理学病变(均P <0.01)之间存在显着正相关。结论:hTERC扩增测试可能是有前途的辅助手段,以高特异性和准确性筛查女性宫颈癌或癌变。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号