首页> 外文期刊>Oncology and Therapy >The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5
【24h】

The Cost Impact of Lenalidomide for Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma in the EU5

机译:来那度胺对EU5新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤的成本影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Lenalidomide is an active agent that was approved for use in the EU in 2015 as a first-line therapy for previously untreated, non-transplant eligible multiple myeloma patients. Our objective was to assess the cost impact of lenalidomide when selected as a first-line treatment for transplant-ineligible patients in France, Germany, Italy, Spain, and the United Kingdom (EU5). Methods We developed a cost-impact model of the total costs associated with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma over 5?years in the EU5 based on treatment duration and time to progression (TTP) (taken from trial data). We compared a baseline scenario (of current lenalidomide uptake) with two alternative future scenarios. Future Scenario A used an increased uptake of first-line lenalidomide: up to 50% in Year 5. Future Scenario B was similar to the baseline, but included a 20% increased uptake of the triple therapy regimen, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) at second line. Results Compared to alternative first-line care pathways, lenalidomide provides a time to progression advantage of up to 5.1?months. In the baseline scenario, the costs per patient were €40,692 in Year 1. Future Scenario A showed an additional expenditure of €867 per patient in Year 1, increasing to €3358 per patient by Year 5, a 2.1% and 8.2% increase from baseline, respectively. However, lenalidomide use was associated with a lower monthly hospitalisation per-patient cost (€813) compared with bortezomib (€1173) and thalidomide (€1532). Future Scenario B was associated with a 29% increase in cost. Conclusions Compared to other first line therapies, lenalidomide delays time to progression resulting in associated savings across a patient’s treatment pathway and overall is likely to result in a limited impact on budget. Lenalidomide should, therefore, be considered as a first treatment option for multiple myeloma patients ineligible for transplant. Funding Celgene Ltd.
机译:引言来那度胺是一种活性剂,已于2015年在欧盟被批准作为一线治疗药物,用于以前未经治疗的,非移植合格的多发性骨髓瘤患者。我们的目标是评估来那度胺在法国,德国,意大利,西班牙和英国(EU5)被选为不适合移植的患者的一线治疗药物时的成本影响。方法我们根据治疗持续时间和进展时间(TTP)(从试验数据中得出),建立了EU5中5年内与新诊断的多发性骨髓瘤相关的总成本的成本影响模型。我们将基线情景(当前来那度胺摄入量)与两个替代的未来情景进行了比较。未来方案A使用一线来那度胺的吸收增加:在第5年增加50%。未来方案B与基线相似,但包括三联疗法,卡非佐米,来那度胺和地塞米松的吸收增加20%( KRd)。结果与其他一线护理途径相比,来那度胺提供了长达5.1个月的进展优势。在基准情况下,第1年每位患者的费用为40,692欧元。未来方案A显示,第1年每位患者的额外支出为867欧元,到第5年增加到每位患者3358欧元,比上年增长2.1%和8.2%基线。然而,与硼替佐米(1173欧元)和沙利度胺(1532欧元)相比,来那度胺的使用与较低的每人每月住院费用(813欧元)相关。未来方案B的成本增加了29%。结论与其他一线疗法相比,来那度胺会延迟进展时间,从而在整个患者的治疗途径中节省相关费用,并且总体而言可能会对预算产生有限的影响。因此,来那度胺应被视为不适合移植的多发性骨髓瘤患者的首选治疗方法。资助Celgene Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号