首页> 外文期刊>Oeno One >Application of remote sensing techniques to discriminate between conventional and organic vineyards in the Loire Valley, France
【24h】

Application of remote sensing techniques to discriminate between conventional and organic vineyards in the Loire Valley, France

机译:运用遥感技术区分法国卢瓦尔河谷的常规葡萄园和有机葡萄园

获取原文
           

摘要

Aim: To test the use of Remote Sensing imagery and techniques to differentiate between conventional and organic vineyards.Methods and results: Conventional and organic vineyards were identified on three satellite images acquired by the ASTER sensor of the Loire Valley. A sample of 46 conventional and 12 organic plots was used; grape varieties were Chenin Blanc (33 plots) and Cabernet Franc (25 plots). Mean reflectances were extracted from pixels inside each plot for the nine spectral bands (visible and infrared) of ASTER. A statistical discriminant analysis was performed. The vegetation index NDVI was also analysed. Results showed that all 12 organic plots, and 41 out of 46 conventional plots were correctly separated, a 91.4% success rate. Also, 23 out of 25 Cabernet, and 30 out of 33 Chenin plots were also correctly identified, also a 91.4% success rate. Regarding NDVI, there are no differences between conventional and organic vineyards within a 5% significant level. Analyses focused on the influences of chemical treatments on vineyard colors and on the effects of light reflected by inter-row spaces, suggested that both processes introduce spectral changes in conventional vineyards, mainly in short-wave infrared. Results also indicate that infrared information is essential to spectral discrimination.Conclusion: The use of chemicals, typical to conventional viticulture, has an impact on leaf composition and cell structure, being an important factor to imprint a characteristic reflectance pattern to these vineyards; the contribution to the integrated reflectance from inter-row vegetation is probably also a differentiating factor. Both causes act synergistically to build a significant spectral difference between conventional and organic vineyards.Significance and impact of the study: Remote Sensing techniques can be used as a first approach to vineyard monitoring, producing relevant information on viticultural methods, which can be used as early indicators of the need for field inspection or conventional laboratory analysis. IntroductionViticultural methods based on eco-friendly approaches have been in steady expansion in the last decades (Brodt et al 2009) and are presently regulated by several organizations, either governmental (EEC 1991; DPI 2010; USDA 2013 and references therein) or private (Ecocert, Qualité France, and others). These methods and their products carry denominations like “biological”, “organic”, or “biodynamic”; in this paper we will refer to them as “organic”. Researches on wine consumers’ preferences reveal a growing interest for organic products (Mollá-Bauzá et al 2005; Jonis et al 2008; Remaud et al 2008). However, the certification procedures are complex and, once a producer is certified, periodical checking is necessary to ensure continuity of compliance to regulations. There are no viticultural regions in the world where all vineyards are organic, and the spatial mixing of conventional and organic vine plots adds logistical problems to an already complex verification system.Certification rules are strict, precise, and fundamental for granting the organic or biodynamic status, but some preliminary information can be helpful to monitoring the current situation of vineyards, either organic or else. Specifically, this paper reports how Remote Sensing techniques can be a complementary source of information, being used as an independent indicator of viticultural methods and as an early indicator of the need for field inspection.For the purposes of this paper, we will state that the basic information from Remote Sensing is the solar radiation reflected from the terrain, and in this case, the solar spectrum is altered by the nature of reflecting objects, which can be soil, vegetation, water, and other “classes”. Specific classes have quite different reflectance spectra (Swain and Davis 1978; Lillesand and Kiefer 1987), and even within a class, sub-classes carry characteristic spectra, making reliable identifications possible. This happens, for example, with vegetation reflectance spectra, and for vineyards it was demonstrated that they can be separated from other vegetation (Da Silva and Ducati 2009), while in another study, positive identifications of grape varieties were reported (Cemin and Ducati 2011).This paper was motivated by oral reports from organic vintners in the Loire Valley, made to the first author while in field trips in the region, stating that they could see by the naked eye the color differences between their vineyards and the neighboring conventional vineyards. Presently, this paper investigates this possibility, extending the spectral range to the infrared, using Remote Sensing techniques, being focused on vineyards, either conventional or organic, in the Loire Valley.If we accept that some viticultural practices (pruning, training systems, etc) are similar for both conventional and organic vineyards, then the differences between these systems will be due, basically, to
机译:目的:测试使用遥感影像和技术区分传统葡萄园和有机葡萄园的方法和结果:在卢瓦尔河谷ASTER传感器采集的三幅卫星图像上识别出常规葡萄园和有机葡萄园。使用了46个常规样地和12个有机样地的样本。葡萄品种有Chenin Blanc(33块)和Cabernet Franc(25块)。从每个图内ASTER的九个光谱带(可见光和红外光)的像素中提取平均反射率。进行统计判别分析。还对植被指数NDVI进行了分析。结果表明,所有12个有机地块和46个常规地块中的41个都已正确分离,成功率为91.4%。此外,还正确识别了25个赤霞珠中的23个和33个Chenin地块中的30个,成功率为91.4%。关于NDVI,传统葡萄园和有机葡萄园之间的差异不超过5%。针对化学处理对葡萄园颜色的影响以及行间空间反射的光的影响进行的分析表明,这两个过程都在常规葡萄园中引入了光谱变化,主要是短波红外。结果还表明,红外信息对于光谱识别至关重要。结论:常规葡萄栽培中典型的化学药品的使用会对叶片组成和细胞结构产生影响,这是在这些葡萄园上刻上特征反射图案的重要因素;行间植被对综合反射率的贡献可能也是一个差异因素。这两种原因协同作用,从而在传统和有机葡萄园之间建立了明显的光谱差异。研究的意义和影响:遥感技术可以用作葡萄园监测的第一种方法,产生有关葡萄栽培方法的相关信息,这些信息可以在早期使用。需要现场检查或常规实验室分析的指标。简介在过去的几十年中,基于生态友好方法的葡萄栽培方法一直在稳步扩展(Brodt等,2009),目前受到政府(EEC 1991; DPI 2010; USDA 2013及其中的参考文献)或私人(Ecocert)几个组织的监管。 ,法国Qualité等)。这些方法及其产品带有“生物”,“有机”或“生物动力”等名称。在本文中,我们将它们称为“有机”。对葡萄酒消费者喜好的研究表明,人们对有机产品的兴趣与日俱增(Mollá-Bauzá等,2005; Jonis等,2008; Remaud等,2008)。但是,认证程序很复杂,一旦生产者获得认证,就必须进行定期检查以确保法规的连续性。世界上没有葡萄栽培区是所有葡萄园都是有机的,常规和有机葡萄田的空间混合给已经很复杂的验证系统增加了后勤问题,认证规则是严格,精确的,是授予有机或生物动力学地位的基础,但一些初步信息可能有助于监测有机葡萄园或其他葡萄园的现状。具体而言,本文报告了遥感技术如何作为信息的补充来源,被用作葡萄栽培方法的独立指标以及现场检查需求的早期指标。出于本文的目的,我们将指出遥感的基本信息是从地形反射的太阳辐射,在这种情况下,太阳光谱会因反射对象的性质而改变,这些对象可能是土壤,植被,水和其他“类别”。特定的类别具有完全不同的反射光谱(Swain和Davis 1978; Lillesand和Kiefer 1987),甚至在一个类别中,子类别也带有特征光谱,从而使可靠的识别成为可能。例如,这发生在植被反射光谱上,对于葡萄园来说,可以证明它们可以与其他植被分开(Da Silva和Ducati 2009),而在另一项研究中,报道了对葡萄品种的阳性鉴定(Cemin和Ducati 2011)。 )。本文的灵感来自卢瓦尔河谷地区有机葡萄酒商的口头报告,该报告是在该地区进行实地考察时向第一作者做出的,称他们可以肉眼看到他们的葡萄园与邻近的常规葡萄园之间的颜色差异。 。目前,本文正在研究这种可能性,使用遥感技术将光谱范围扩展到红外,重点是卢瓦尔河谷的常规或有机葡萄园。如果我们接受某些葡萄栽培实践(修剪,培训系统等) )对于传统葡萄园和有机葡萄园都是相似的,那么这些系统之间的差异基本上是由于

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号