首页> 外文期刊>Oil & gas science and technology >Large-Scale Column Experiment: Study of CO2, Porewater, Rock Reactions and Model Test Case
【24h】

Large-Scale Column Experiment: Study of CO2, Porewater, Rock Reactions and Model Test Case

机译:大型色谱柱实验:CO2,孔隙水,岩石反应和模型测试案例的研究

获取原文
           

摘要

During underground carbon dioxide (CO2) storage operations in deep reservoirs, the CO2 can be trapped in three ways; - as "free" CO2, most likely as a supercritical phase (physical trapping); - dissolved in formation water (hydrodynamic trapping); - precipitated in carbonate phases such as calcite (mineral trapping). This study focuses on the reactions between CO2, porewater and host rock. The aim of this work was to provide a well-constrained long-term laboratory experiment reacting known quantities of minerals with CO2-rich fluids, in order to try and represent situations where CO2 is being injected into lithologies deep underground. The experimental results can then be used as a test case with which to help validate predictive geochemical computer models. These will help improve our ability to predict the long-term fate of carbon dioxide (CO2) stored underground. The experiment, though complex in terms of equipment, ran for approximately 7.5 months. The reacted material was then examined for mineralogical changes and the collected fluids analysed to provide data on the fate of the dissolved species. Changes were readily observable on the carbonates present in thestarting material, which matches well with the observed trends in the fluid chemistry. However, although changes in silica concentrations were seen in the fluid chemistry no evidence for pitting or etching was noted in the silica bearing phases. Modelling of the experimental systems was performed using the BGS coupled code, PRECIP. As a general conclusion, the model predictions tend to over estimate the degree of reaction compared with the results from the experiment. In particular, some mineral phases (e.g. dawsonite) that are predicted to form in large quantities by the model are not seen at all in the experimental system. The differences between the model predictions and the experimental observations highlight the need for thermodynamic and kinetic data to be available under appropriate conditions (pH, and chemical composition of the fluid as well as temperature, and pressure), as extrapolation or "best guesses" may lead to errors being induced in the predictions. These errors and gaps in the data become obvious when comparing model predictions with experiments which serves to emphasise the importance of having "test cases" with which the models can be validated.
机译:在深层储层中地下二氧化碳(CO2)的存储操作期间,可以通过三种方式捕获CO2。 -作为“游离” CO2,最有可能作为超临界相(物理捕集); -溶于地层水中(流体动力捕集); -沉淀在方解石等碳酸盐相中(矿物捕集)。这项研究的重点是二氧化碳,孔隙水和基质岩石之间的反应。这项工作的目的是提供一个约束良好的长期实验室实验,以使已知数量的矿物与富含CO2的流体发生反应,从而尝试并代表将CO2注入地下深层岩性的情况。然后,可以将实验结果用作测试用例,以帮助验证预测性地球化学计算机模型。这些将有助于提高我们预测地下储存的二氧化碳(CO2)长期命运的能力。该实验虽然设备复杂,但运行了大约7.5个月。然后检查反应物质的矿物学变化,并对收集的液体进行分析,以提供有关溶解物质命运的数据。原料中存在的碳酸盐变化很容易观察到,这与流体化学中观察到的趋势非常吻合。然而,尽管在流体化学中观察到二氧化硅浓度的变化,但在二氧化硅承载相中没有发现点蚀或蚀刻的证据。使用BGS耦合代码PRECIP对实验系统进行建模。作为一般结论,与实验结果相比,模型预测往往会过高估计反应程度。尤其是,在该模型中,根本看不到该模型预测会大量形成的某些矿物相(例如片钠铝石)。模型预测和实验观察值之间的差异突出表明,需要在适当的条件下(pH,流体的化学成分以及温度和压力)获得热力学和动力学数据,这可能是外推法或“最佳猜测”导致在预测中引起错误。当将模型预测与实验进行比较时,数据中的这些错误和空白变得明显,这凸显了拥有“测试案例”来验证模型的重要性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号