首页> 外文期刊>OncoTargets and therapy >Whole-body MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for pretherapeutic assessment and staging of lymphoma: a meta-analysis
【24h】

Whole-body MRI versus 18F-FDG PET/CT for pretherapeutic assessment and staging of lymphoma: a meta-analysis

机译:全身MRI与 18 F-FDG PET / CT进行淋巴瘤的治疗前评估和分期:一项荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Purpose: 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is the reference standard in staging of 18F-FDG-avid lymphomas; however, there is no recommended functional imaging modality for indolent lymphomas. Therefore, we aimed to compare the performance of whole-body magnetic resonance imaging (WB-MRI) with that of 18F-FDG PET/CT for lesion detection and initial staging in patients with aggressive or indolent lymphoma. Materials and methods: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases for studies that compared WB-MRI with 18F-FDG PET/CT for lymphoma staging or lesion detection. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed using version 2 of the “Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies” tool. The pooled staging accuracy (μ) of WB-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for initial staging and for assessing possible heterogeneity ( χ 2) across studies were calculated using commercially available software. Results: Eight studies comprising 338 patients were included. In terms of staging, the meta-analytic staging accuracies of WB-MRI and 18F-FDG PET/CT for Hodgkin lymphoma and aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) were 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%) and 98% (95% CI, 94%–100%), respectively. The pooled staging accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT dropped to 87% (95% CI, 72%–97%) for staging in patients with indolent lymphoma, whereas that of WB-MRI remained 96% (95% CI, 91%–100%). Subgroup analysis indicated an even lower staging accuracy of 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of less FDG-avid indolent NHLs (60%; 95% CI, 23%–92%), in contrast to the superior performance of WB-MRI (98%; 95% CI, 88%–100%). Conclusion: WB-MRI is a promising radiation-free imaging technique that may serve as a viable alternative to 18F-FDG PET/CT for staging of 18FDG-avid lymphomas, where 18F-FDG PET/CT remains the standard of care. Additionally, WB-MRI seems a less histology-dependent functional imaging test than 18F-FDG PET/CT and may be the imaging test of choice for staging of indolent NHLs with low 18F-FDG avidity.
机译:目的: 18 F-氟脱氧葡萄糖( 18 F-FDG)正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(PET / CT)是 18 分期的参考标准 F-FDG-avid淋巴瘤;但是,对于惰性淋巴瘤,没有推荐的功能成像方式。因此,我们旨在比较全身核磁共振成像(WB-MRI)和 18 F-FDG PET / CT在侵袭性或惰性淋巴瘤患者的病变检测和初始分期中的性能。材料和方法:我们在MEDLINE,EMBASE和CENTRAL数据库中进行了研究,以将WB-MRI与 18 F-FDG PET / CT进行淋巴瘤分期或病变检测进行比较。研究的方法学质量使用“诊断准确性研究质量评估”工具的版本2进行评估。使用以下方法计算了WB-MRI和 18 F-FDG PET / CT用于初始分期和评估研究中可能的异质性(χ 2 )的合并分期准确性(μ)市售软件。结果:包括338名患者的八项研究。就分期而言,WB-MRI和 18 F-FDG PET / CT对霍奇金淋巴瘤和侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)的荟萃分析分期准确性为98%(95%CI, 94%–100%)和98%(95%CI,94%–100%)。对于惰性淋巴瘤患者, 18 F-FDG PET / CT的合并分期准确性降至87%(95%CI,72%–97%),而WB-MRI仍为96 %(95%CI,91%–100%)。亚组分析表明, 18 F-FDG PET / CT的分期准确性甚至更低,与较少的FDG-avid惰性NHL分期相比(60%; 95%CI,23%–92%) WB-MRI的出色表现(98%; 95%CI,88%–100%)。结论:WB-MRI是一种有前途的无辐射成像技术,可替代 18 F-FDG PET / CT对 18 FDG-avid淋巴瘤进行分期,其中 18 F-FDG PET / CT仍然是护理标准。此外,与 18 F-FDG PET / CT相比,WB-MRI似乎对组织学的依赖性较小,可能是 18 的惰性NHL分期的首选影像学检查。 sup> F-FDG亲和力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号