...
首页> 外文期刊>KYAMC Journal >A Comparison of Orally Administered Misoprostol With Vaginally Administered Misoprostol For Cervical Ripening And Labour Induction
【24h】

A Comparison of Orally Administered Misoprostol With Vaginally Administered Misoprostol For Cervical Ripening And Labour Induction

机译:口服米索前列醇与阴道用米索前列醇宫颈成熟和引产的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective: To compare efficacy and safety of oral misoprostol over vaginal misoprostol for labour induction. Materials and Methods: This is a cross sectional interventional hospital based comparative study which was carried in the department of Obstetrics and Gynecology in DMCH from 01.07.2008 to 31.12.2008. Results: Almost equal number of patients delivered vaginally spontaneously in both group, there is no association between route of administration and mode of delivery. Nausea,vomiting occurred more in oral group and uterine hypertonicity more in vaginal group. Conclusion: In this study, 50 patients were randomly selected for oral group and 50 patients for vaginal group. There were no significant differences regarding age, duration of pregnancy, Bishop's score and indication of induction of labour. KYAMC Journal Vol. 7, No.-1, Jul 2016, Page 668-672
机译:目的:比较口服米索前列醇与阴道米索前列醇进行引产的有效性和安全性。材料和方法:这是一项基于横断面医院的比较研究,于2008年1月7日至2008年12月31日在DMCH的妇产科进行。结果:两组中几乎相同数量的患者通过阴道自发分娩,给药途径和分娩方式之间没有关联。口服组恶心,呕吐多见,阴道组多见子宫高渗。结论:本研究随机选择口服组50例,阴道组50例。在年龄,怀孕持续时间,Bishop评分和引产指征方面无显着差异。 KYAMC杂志第一卷7,No.-1,2016年7月,第668-672页

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号