首页> 外文期刊>Revista da Sociedade Brasileira de Medicina Tropical >Comparative evaluation of adverse effects in the use of powder trivalent antivenom and liquid antivenoms in Bothrops snake bites
【24h】

Comparative evaluation of adverse effects in the use of powder trivalent antivenom and liquid antivenoms in Bothrops snake bites

机译:两种蛇药蛇口中使用三价抗氧剂和液体抗氧剂的不良反应的比较评价。

获取原文
       

摘要

INTRODUCTION: Snake bite, a problem in public health, generally occurs where there is no electric power. METHODS: A comparative clinical study was conducted with 102 victims of Bothrops snake bite, from the state of Amazonas, Brazil; 58 victims were treated with liofilizated trivalent antivenom serum (SATL) and 44 victims treated with liquid bivalent and monovalent antivenom serum (SAMBL). RESULTS: 17% (10/58) of patients presented adverse effects with the SATL and 25% (11/44) with the SAMBL. CONCLUSIONS: There was no statistic difference in number of adverse effects between the two types of snake bite antivenom.
机译:简介:蛇咬伤是公共卫生中的一个问题,通常在没有电源的地方发生。方法:对来自巴西亚马孙州的102名波普罗斯蛇咬伤的受害者进行了比较临床研究。 58例患者接受了软化三价抗蛇毒血清(SATL)治疗,44例受害者接受了液体二价和单价抗蛇毒血清(SAMBL)治疗。结果:17%(10/58)的患者对SATL产生不良反应,而25%(11/44)的患者对SAMBL产生不良反应。结论:两种类型的蛇咬抗毒剂之间的不良反应数量没有统计学差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号