...
首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology Advances in Practice >Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis: two sides of the same coin in an elderly female?
【24h】

Giant cell arteritis and Takayasu arteritis: two sides of the same coin in an elderly female?

机译:巨细胞性动脉炎和高隆动脉炎:老年女性中同一枚硬币的两个侧面?

获取原文

摘要

Introduction Large vessel vasculitis (LVV) is a heterogeneous group of conditions, comprising of giant cell arteritis (GCA) and Takayasu arteritis (TAK). The American College of Rheumatologists (ACR) criteria provides a scoring system based on age, symptoms, and clinical examination findings, investigations to reach a diagnosis of either GCA or TAK. Similarly, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations discuss various imaging modalities in visualising vascular inflammation. Management is typically glucocorticoids, but for relapsing disease the challenge is finding suitable glucocorticoid-sparing agents. Here we describe a case of LVV presenting with great diagnostic complexity, discussing diagnostic modalities, treatment options and complications of therapy. Case description A 64-year-old female was referred to rheumatology clinic following extensive negative investigations, apart from on-going inflammatory response under gastroenterology for unexplained weight loss for over a year. Further history revealed lower limb cramps, fatigue and frontal headaches. She did not report any jaw claudication or visual disturbances but had atypical neck pain. As the main carer for her mother with dementia all these symptoms led to significant functional impairment and a great deal of anxiety for the patient. Under the gastroenterologists, she has had negative upper and lower GI endoscopies, CT thorax, abdomen and pelvis, labelled white cell scan and isotope bone scan in addition to a comprehensive septic screen including spinal imaging. A diagnosis of systemic vasculitis was suspected. ANCA screen was negative. Patient declined a superficial temporal artery biopsy. A FDG PET scan confirmed increased activity in medium and large sized vessels, such as the common carotids, descending thoracic aorta, vertebral arteries, and femoral arteries. Sites of metabolic hypersignal were consistent with large vessel vasculitis. Previous CT angiography was reviewed once again. No evidence of TAK was identified. GCA-LVV was decided as the most likely diagnosis. The patient responded well to induction oral steroids with marked and rapid improvement in the inflammatory response. During the weaning down of steroids, the weight loss and the inflammatory response recurred. Steroid sparing therapy was added on. Azathioprine was shortly discontinued owing to deranged liver function tests despite normal TPMT levels. Methotrexate was stopped as it caused suspected acute pneumonitis. Oral bisphosphonates were not tolerated and she was listed for IV. Shortly after, she suffered a low trauma fracture neck of femur which caused fat emboli leading to a dense stroke. She recovered gradually with anticoagulation.?Currently she is being screened for SC tocilizumab. Discussion Diagnosing LVV can be challenging owing to non-specific symptoms at presentation. Although our patient’s presentation of fatigue, weight loss and worsening inflammatory markers were reflective of a vasculitis-like pathology from the onset, confirming the exact diagnosis was far from straightforward. LVV has countless clinical manifestations with new onset headaches being the most predominant. Limb claudication, another presenting symptom, is described in literature as a clinical manifestation of LVV in 5-15% of cases. The patient’s complaint of neck pain is also a feature associated with external carotid artery disease. Various imaging modalities, including MRI, CT angiogram, and FDG PET scans have been implicated in the diagnosis of LVV. Currently, no diagnostic threshold exists beyond which uptake is defining of vasculitis. One study (n?=?40) evaluating diagnostic accuracy of PET scans in LVV cases against control patients, calculated 80% specificity and 65% sensitivity. Whereas, another study (n?=?24) reported 100% specificity in use of PET scans for diagnosis of extracranial GCA. A second dilemma encountered in this case following LVV diagnosis, was concluding the subtype. The patient’s diminishing pulses, a characteristic feature of TAK, was evaluated using angiography techniques. Results were inconsistent with the expected characteristic aortic stenosis or occlusions described by TAK diagnostic criteria. Despite no histological assessment from superficial temporal arteries, due to lack of scalp tenderness and jaw claudication, diagnosis was confirmed and managed as GCA-LVV. This case was further complicated by finding a management regime both effective at tackling GCA-LVV activity, but also suitable for the patient. Disease which follows a relapsing course is indication for glucocorticoid-sparing agents. Published data is increasingly favouring use of tocilizumab, with a randomised control trial (n?=?251) showing sustained remission in around 56% of patients. The aim with our patient remains finding a balance between adverse side effects and medication efficacy. Key learning points LVV is frequently the least obvious diagnosis, but nonetheless an important di
机译:引言大血管血管炎(LVV)是一组异质性疾病,包括巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)和Takayasu动脉炎(TAK)。美国风湿病医师学院(ACR)标准提供了基于年龄,症状和临床检查结果的评分系统,以进行诊断以诊断GCA或TAK。同样,欧洲抗风湿病联盟(EULAR)的建议讨论了可视化血管炎症的各种成像方式。管理通常是糖皮质激素,但是对于复发性疾病而言,挑战是寻找合适的糖皮质激素保留剂。在这里,我们描述了一个LVV病例,它具有很大的诊断复杂性,讨论了诊断方式,治疗选择和治疗并发症。病例描述一名64岁的女性经过广泛的阴性调查后被转诊至风湿病诊所,除了胃肠道疾病持续的炎症反应(原因不明的体重减轻超过一年)外。进一步的病史显示下肢抽筋,疲劳和额头头痛。她没有报告下颌lau行或视觉障碍,但有非典型的颈部疼痛。作为患有痴呆症的母亲的主要照顾者,所有这些症状导致患者严重的功能障碍和极大的焦虑感。在胃肠病学家的指导下,她的胃肠道上下检查均阴性,CT胸部,腹部和骨盆,标记的白细胞扫描和同位素骨扫描,以及包括脊柱成像在内的全面化脓检查。怀疑诊断为系统性血管炎。 ANCA屏幕为阴性。患者拒绝颞浅动脉活检。 FDG PET扫描证实中型和大型血管(例如颈总动脉,胸主动脉下降,椎动脉和股动脉)的活动增加。代谢性高信号部位与大血管血管炎一致。先前的CT血管造影再次被检查。没有发现TAK的证据。 GCA-LVV被认为是最可能的诊断。患者对诱导性口服类固醇的反应良好,炎症反应明显且迅速改善。在类固醇断奶期间,体重减轻和炎症反应反复出现。保留类固醇激素疗法。尽管TPMT水平正常,但由于肝功能检查异常,很快停用了硫唑嘌呤。甲氨蝶呤因引起怀疑的急性肺炎而被停用。口服双膦酸盐不被接受,她被列为静脉注射。此后不久,她的股骨颈受到创伤小,导致脂肪栓塞导致中风。经过抗凝治疗,她逐渐恢复了健康。目前,她正在接受SC托珠单抗的筛查。讨论由于出现时症状不明确,诊断LVV可能具有挑战性。尽管我们的患者从一开始就表现出疲劳,体重减轻和炎性标志恶化,但从一开始就反映出血管炎样病理,但要确认确切的诊断远非易事。 LVV具有无数的临床表现,其中以新发头痛为最主要。肢体c行是另一种症状,在文献中被描述为5-15%病例的LVV临床表现。患者对颈部疼痛的主诉也是颈外动脉疾病的特征。 LVV的诊断涉及各种成像方式,包括MRI,CT血管造影和FDG PET扫描。当前,不存在诊断阈值,超过该阈值定义了血管炎。一项评估LVV病例对对照患者的PET扫描诊断准确性的研究(n = 40)计算出80%的特异性和65%的敏感性。而另一项研究(n≥24)报道了使用PET扫描诊断颅外GCA的100%特异性。 LVV诊断后,在这种情况下遇到的第二个难题是得出该亚型。使用血管造影技术评估了患者逐渐减少的脉搏,这是TAK的一个特征。结果与TAK诊断标准所描述的预期特征性主动脉瓣狭窄或阻塞不一致。尽管没有从颞浅动脉进行组织学评估,但由于缺乏头皮压痛和jaw行lau行,确诊并确诊为GCA-LVV。通过找到既能有效解决GCA-LVV活性又适合患者的管理方案,使该病例进一步复杂化。复发过程中的疾病是糖皮质激素保留剂的适应症。公开的数据越来越多地支持使用tocilizumab,一项随机对照试验(n?=?251)显示约56%的患者持续缓解。我们患者的目标仍然是在不良副作用和药物疗效之间找到平衡。学习要点LVV通常是最不明显的诊断,但重要的诊断

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号