首页> 外文期刊>Risk Governance & Control: Financial Markets & Institutions >A WHITE ELEPHANT IS NOT A BLACK SWAN: WHY YOU CAN DO MORE ABOUT IT PROJECT RISK THAN YOU THINK (A REPLY TO FLYVBERG AND BUDZIER)
【24h】

A WHITE ELEPHANT IS NOT A BLACK SWAN: WHY YOU CAN DO MORE ABOUT IT PROJECT RISK THAN YOU THINK (A REPLY TO FLYVBERG AND BUDZIER)

机译:白象不是黑天鹅:为什么您可以比自己想更多的关于项目风险的信息(对弗莱伯格和布吉耶的答复)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Failed IT projects destroy value on a massive scale. Failure occurs because traditional efforts to improve IT performance treat project delivery as an operational endeavor driven by technologists. Progress, these technologists say, lies in ever more complex implementation methodologies. In reality, an IT project is a business endeavor which must be evaluated in financial terms, both as a standalone effort and in relation to other efforts competing for resources. Moreover, a client or vendor’s projects represent a rolling collection of endeavors. They are best analyzed and managed as a portfolio. Proof of success will not only come through better project delivery and business ROI but the ability to insure IT projects for timeliness, adherence to budget, and full functionality.
机译:失败的IT项目会大规模破坏价值。之所以会出现失败,是因为传统的提高IT绩效的努力将项目交付视为技术人员的推动。这些技术人员说,进步在于越来越复杂的实现方法。实际上,IT项目是一项业务工作,必须从财务角度进行评估,既要作为独立的工作,又要与其他争夺资源的工作相关。此外,客户或供应商的项目代表着不断滚动的努力。最好将它们作为投资组合进行分析和管理。成功的证明不仅将取决于更好的项目交付和业务ROI,而且还将具有确保IT项目及时性,遵守预算和完整功能的能力。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号