首页> 外文期刊>Revista Romana de Bioetica >The concept of ?dignity” of the human being in bioethics and biolaw
【24h】

The concept of ?dignity” of the human being in bioethics and biolaw

机译:生物伦理学和生物法中人的“尊严”概念

获取原文
           

摘要

Although international documents concerning human rights directly or indirectly refer to the human being dignity, this concept is not defined and this ambiguity makes this term to seem lack content. In the bioethics field, one of the lately adopted documents, the Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights (from 2005) is very relevant because it suggests as criteria for dignity respect: the research should expose the person to minimum risks only, it should be carried out in the health interest of the ones in the same category and it should be compatible with the protection of the individual rights. Dignity can be understood only in relation with the other principles of bioethics: autonomy, responsibility, respect of human being, vulnerability, the individual’s integrity, respect of private life etc, which represent a continuation of human rights in the field of biomedicine. The “adventure” of bioethics started with the qualification of the human genome as a “humanity common patrimony”. The human being has a series of rights that are inherent to this quality and whose inobservance would damage the human essence that it contains, the set of qualities that differentiates us from the other species. At the same time, the correlative obligation concerns the protection of this inherited patrimony and the provision of its continuity over generations. The concept of dignity is indispensable to this process. Humanity, in its global aspect, and each being that is a part of it, has to enjoy this right within the limits of dignity and of all other fundamental rights. In the legal order of the European Union, “dignity” includes the respect of the right to life and person’s integrity, the interdiction of torture, of degrading and inhuman treatments or punishments, the interdiction of slavery and of forced labor. The article also contains some references to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) in this field, both from the bioethical perspective and from the legal one in general.
机译:尽管有关人权的国际文件直接或间接提到了人的尊严,但并未定义这一概念,而且这种模棱两可的措辞使该用语似乎缺乏内容。在生物伦理学领域,作为最近通过的文件之一,《世界生物伦理与人权宣言》(2005年起)非常相关,因为它建议作为尊严的标准:研究应仅使人面临最小风险,应出于同一个类别的人的健康利益而进行,并且应与个人权利的保护相适应。尊严只能与生物伦理学的其他原则联系在一起来理解:自治,责任,对人的尊重,脆弱性,个人完整性,对私人生活的尊重等,这些代表着生物医学领域人权的延续。生物伦理学的“冒险”始于将人类基因组定性为“人类共同遗产”。人类拥有一系列固有的权利,这种权利固有的权利会破坏人类所包含的人类本质,这是使我们与其他物种区分开的特质。同时,相关义务涉及对这种继承的遗产的保护以及其世代相传的连续性。尊严的概念对于这个过程是必不可少的。从全球的角度来看,人类及其每个部分都必须在尊严和所有其他基本权利的范围内享受这项权利。在欧洲联盟的法律秩序中,“尊严”包括对生命权和人身完整权的尊重,对酷刑,有辱人格的待遇和不人道待遇或处罚的禁止,对奴隶制和强迫劳动的禁止。本文还从生物伦理学角度和一般法律角度对欧洲人权法院(ECHR)的判例进行了一些参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号