...
首页> 外文期刊>LIBER Quarterly - Journal of European Research Libraries >Sustainable Free: Lessons Learned from the Launch of a Free Service Supporting Publishing in Art History
【24h】

Sustainable Free: Lessons Learned from the Launch of a Free Service Supporting Publishing in Art History

机译:可持续的免费:推出免费服务以支持艺术史出版的经验教训

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Hilary Ballon and Mariet Westermann, writing about the struggles of publishing in art history noted that “It is a paradox of the digital revolution that it has never been easier to produce and circulate a reproductive image, and never harder to publish one.” If publishing in general is in crisis because of the seismic re-ordering in a digital world, the field of art history is the extreme tail of the spectrum; rights holders are accustomed to licensing image content for limited edition print runs. Given this particularly challenging corner of the publishing work, a project initiated by the Metropolitan Museum offers some hope of a collaborative way forward. What sociological re-engineering enabled progress on this problem? It is possible that there are other lessons here too, that might throw at least streaks of light on other process re-engineering provoked by digital innovation in publishing??This paper reviews how a leading repository of art (The Metropolitan Museum of Art) and a non-profit intermediary (ARTstor) created an alternative pathway to provide primary source content in support of image-intensive publishing. This venture is framed in the context of a publishing system moving toward greater freedom and an aim to bring about ever lower (or no) fees to readers.In general, providing academic content for free requires a re-structuring of a public release process – either of processed content or less processed content. To the extent that processing adds value, it might be worth paying for. This case study argues that there are places where community wide interests align, describes what it takes to keep them aligned, and explores what we did collectively to facilitate re-structuring. The conclusion explores whether there are lessons for open access publishing more generally in the example of cross-subsidization among mission (and not only marketing) driven organizations.
机译:希拉里·巴隆(Hilary Ballon)和玛丽埃·韦斯特曼(Mariet Westermann)在谈到艺术史上的出版斗争时指出:“这是数字革命的悖论,它从未像现在这样容易地制作和发行生殖图像,也从未像现在这样难于出版。”如果由于数字世界中的地震重新排序而使出版总体处于危机之中,那么艺术史领域将是最极端的领域。版权持有人习惯于为限量版印刷运行许可图像内容。考虑到出版工作这一特别具有挑战性的角落,大都会博物馆发起的一个项目为合作前进提供了一些希望。什么样的社会学再造就这一问题取得了进展?这里也可能有其他的教训,这至少可以揭示出版业数字创新引发的其他流程再造的问题。本文回顾了领先的艺术资料库(大都会艺术博物馆)和非营利中介机构(ARTstor)创建了另一种途径来提供主要来源内容,以支持图像密集型发布。这项业务是建立在向更大的自由迈进的发布系统的背景下,旨在向读者带来更低(或没有)的费用。总的来说,免费提供学术内容需要对公开发布流程进行重组-处理的内容或处理较少的内容。在一定程度上,加工可以增加价值,这可能值得付出。该案例研究认为,在某些地方,社区广泛的利益一致,描述了保持利益一致所需要采取的措施,并探讨了我们为促进重组而共同采取的行动。该结论探讨了在以任务为主导的组织(不仅是营销组织)之间进行交叉补贴的情况下,是否更普遍地提供开放获取发布的课程。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号