...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de So Paulo >Comparison between E-test and CLSI broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans oral isolates
【24h】

Comparison between E-test and CLSI broth microdilution method for antifungal susceptibility testing of Candida albicans oral isolates

机译:E-test和CLSI肉汤微量稀释法对白色念珠菌口服分离株抗真菌药敏试验的比较

获取原文

摘要

Thirty Candida albicans isolated from oral candidosis patients and 30 C. albicans isolated from control individuals were studied. In vitro susceptibility tests were performed for amphotericin B, fluconazole, 5-flucytosine and itraconazole through the Clinical and Laboratorial Standards Institute (CLSI) reference method and E test system. The results obtained were analyzed and compared. MIC values were similar for the strains isolated from oral candidosis patients and control individuals. The agreement rate for the two methods was 66.67% for amphotericin B, 53.33% for fluconazole, 65% for flucytosine and 45% for itraconazole. According to our data, E test method could be an alternative to trial routine susceptibility testing due to its simplicity. However, it can not be considered a substitute for the CLSI reference method.
机译:研究了从口腔念珠菌病患者中分离出的三十株白色念珠菌和从对照个体中分离出的三十株白色念珠菌。通过临床和实验室标准协会(CLSI)参考方法和E测试系统对两性霉素B,氟康唑,5-氟胞嘧啶和伊曲康唑进行了体外药敏试验。对获得的结果进行分析和比较。从口腔念珠菌病患者和对照组分离出的菌株的MIC值相似。两种方法的一致性为:两性霉素B为66.67%,氟康唑为53.33%,氟胞嘧啶为65%,伊曲康唑为45%。根据我们的数据,由于E检验方法简单易行,因此它可以替代常规的药敏试验。但是,不能认为它是CLSI参考方法的替代方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号