首页> 外文期刊>Revista Clinica de Periodoncia, Implantologia y Rehabilitacion Oral >Selection of tooth colour: Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods.
【24h】

Selection of tooth colour: Comparison of visual and spectrophotometric methods.

机译:牙齿颜色的选择:目测和分光光度法的比较。

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction In cosmetic dentistry the selection of colour can be performed by visual or instrumental methods. The former is subjective, influenced by multiple factors and widely used by dentists, whilst the latter, using a spectrophotometer, is objective and simple but little used. Objective To compare the results in the selection of colour by a visual method and using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer, to verify whether there are differences between them. Material and method A total of 50 dentists, 25 men and 25 women, were asked to select the colour of a healthy anterior tooth using the 3D Master Vitapan, and the results were compared with those obtained when using the Easyshade Compact spectrophotometer. The data obtained were analysed using the Chi-squared statistical test. Results The colour obtained by the visual colour selection matched that obtained with spectrophotometer by 18% of dentists. The colour selection by the visual method was different to that obtained with the spectrophotometer for 76% of women and 88% of men. Conclusions There are statistically significant differences between the selection of colour with the visual method and with spectrophotometer (P?P.
机译:简介在美容牙科中,颜色的选择可以通过视觉或仪器方法进行。前者是主观的,受多种因素的影响并被牙医广泛使用,而后者使用分光光度计则客观,简单,但很少使用。目的通过视觉方法和Easyshade Compact分光光度计比较颜色选择的结果,以验证它们之间是否存在差异。材料和方法使用3D Master Vitapan,总共要求50名牙医(25名男性和25名女性)选择健康的前牙颜色,并将结果与​​使用Easyshade Compact分光光度计获得的结果进行比较。使用卡方统计检验分析获得的数据。结果通过视觉颜色选择获得的颜色与使用分光光度计获得的颜色相匹配的牙医为18%。视觉方法的颜色选择与分光光度计对76%的女性和88%的男性的选择不同。结论视觉方法和分光光度计(P?P。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号