首页> 外文期刊>Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem >Developing a comparative scale of different nociceptive and neuropathic pain through two psychophysical methods
【24h】

Developing a comparative scale of different nociceptive and neuropathic pain through two psychophysical methods

机译:通过两种心理物理方法建立不同伤害性和神经性疼痛的比较量表

获取原文
           

摘要

The general aim of this study was to create a comparative scale of different types of pain through different psychophysical methods and different samples. The psychophysical methods used were magnitude estimation and category estimation. The participants were 30 patients from different outpatient clinics, 30 physicians and 30 nurses. The results were: 1) cancer pain, myocardial infarction pain, renal colic, burn-injury pain, and labor pain were considered more intense, regardless of the psychophysical method used or sample studied; 2) The ranking of different pain intensities, comparing the different psychophysical methods used, resulted in significant agreement levels with Kendal values close to 1.00; 3) There were divergences in the perception of the intensities of some types of pain. These divergences were especially observed between professionals and patients.
机译:这项研究的总体目的是通过不同的心理物理方法和不同的样本来创建不同类型疼痛的比较量表。所使用的心理物理方法是幅度估计和类别估计。参与者是来自不同门诊诊所的30位患者,30位医生和30位护士。结果是:1)不论使用何种心理物理方法或所研究的样品,均认为癌症疼痛,心肌梗塞疼痛,肾绞痛,烧伤疼痛和劳动疼痛更为剧烈; 2)比较不同的疼痛强度等级,比较使用的不同心理物理方法,得出的肯德值显着一致,接近1.00; 3)对某些类型的疼痛强度的理解存在分歧。这些分歧在专业人员和患者之间尤其明显。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号