...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte >Limiar de lactato em remadores: compara??o entre dois métodos de determina??o
【24h】

Limiar de lactato em remadores: compara??o entre dois métodos de determina??o

机译:赛艇运动员中的乳酸阈值:两种测定方法之间的比较

获取原文

摘要

The objective of this study was to compare the 4 mM (AT4) and Dmax methods for lactate threshold determination. Ten male (23.7 ± 3.33 years) and four female rowers (18 ± 0.81 years), divided into three groups: heavy weight (n = 6), light weight (n = 4), and female (n = 4), (87.23 ± 6.10, 73.22 ± 2.38, 63.27 ± 8.86 kg and 187.66 ± 1.63, 183 ± 6.05, 172 ± 5.16 cm respectively), were submitted to a maximal rowing ergometry, with initial workload of 130 to 150 W and increases of 30 to 50 W every 5 minutes, with 1 minute pause for blood sampling. Power output, heart rate and lactate values were determined at every workload and used for the determination of the thresholds according to both methods. Lactate concentration, power output and heart rate, identified by Dmax method were compared with the AT4 method in the heavy weight (3.01 ± 0.73 vs. 4 mM, 268.33 ± 29.44 vs. 312 ± 44.02 W and 164 ± 4.81 vs. 174 ± 10.09 bpm), light weight (2.51 ± 0.53 vs. 4 mM, 232.50 ± 15.00 vs. 277.50 ± 25.98 W and 160 ± 8.47 vs. 177 ± 3.79 bpm) and female (3.21 ± 0.41 vs. 4 mM, 160 ± 14.41 vs. 167.50 ± 15.00 W and 175 ± 20.42 vs. 185 ± 12.12 bpm) groups through the paired Student t-test, being significantly lower (p < 0.05) when the method Dmax was used. The results suggest that the AT4 method overestimates the variables analyzed in the lactate threshold when compared with the Dmax method.
机译:这项研究的目的是比较4 mM(AT4)和Dmax方法测定乳酸盐阈值。十名男性(23.7±3.33岁)和四名女性划船者(18±0.81岁),分为三组:重(n = 6),轻(n = 4)和女性(n = 4),(87.23)分别以±6.10、73.22±2.38、63.27±8.86千克和187.66±1.63、183±6.05、172±5.16厘米)进行最大划船测功,初始工作负荷为130至150 W,增加了30至50 W每5分钟一次,暂停1分钟以进行血液采样。在每种工作负荷下确定功率输出,心率和乳酸值,并根据两种方法将其用于确定阈值。将Dmax方法确定的乳酸浓度,功率输出和心率与AT4方法在较重的重量下进行了比较(3.01±0.73 vs. 4 mM,268.33±29.44 vs. 312±44.02 W和164±4.81 vs. 174±10.09 bpm),重量轻(2.51±0.53 vs.4 mM,232.50±15.00 vs.277.50±25.98 W和160±8.47 vs.177±3.79 bpm)和女性(3.21±0.41 vs.4 mM,160±14.41 vs.通过配对的Student t检验,分别为167.50±15.00 W和175±20.42 vs. 185±12.12 bpm)组,当使用Dmax方法时,这些组明显更低(p <0.05)。结果表明,与Dmax方法相比,AT4方法高估了乳酸阈值中分析的变量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号