...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Epidemiologia >Preventive practices of cancer screening in women: comparison of estimates from ISA - Capital survey and the telephonebased Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases (VIGITEL - S?o Paulo)
【24h】

Preventive practices of cancer screening in women: comparison of estimates from ISA - Capital survey and the telephonebased Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases (VIGITEL - S?o Paulo)

机译:妇女癌症筛查的预防措施:ISA的估计值比较-资本调查和基于电话的慢性病风险和保护因子监测(VIGITEL-圣保罗)

获取原文
           

摘要

> face="Verdana" size="2">OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare estimates of Pap smear and mammogram screening obtained from household and telephone surveys in women living in São Paulo in 2008, according to sociodemographic characteristics, and to measure the differences observed from those estimates. METHODS: The study compared data from ISA - Capital 2008, a household survey conducted in São Paulo by Universidade de São Paulo (USP), Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) and the State Health Department with support from the Municipal Health Department, and VIGITEL - São Paulo, a telephone-based Surveillance of Risk and Protective Factors for Chronic Diseases. Estimates of Pap smear and mammography, as well as their realization in the year prior to the interview, were compared according to type of survey (household/telephone) by Poisson regression adjusted for age and education. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the estimates obtained by VIGITEL and ISA - Capital as to the prevalence of mammography in the year prior to the interview. However, global estimates of the Pap smear at least once in life and in the past year, as well as mammograghy at least once in life, shown statistically significant differences, with higher prevalence rates of coverage among those interviewed by telephone. CONCLUSION: The results indicate a tendency to overestimate coverage of mammography and Pap smear in the telephone survey data, which indicates the need for new studies that also contribute to a better understanding of the differences observed by different types of surveys.
机译:> face =“ Verdana” size =“ 2”> 目的:本研究的目的是比较从居住和居住在城市的妇女进行的家庭和电话调查中获得的子宫颈抹片检查和乳房X线照片筛查的估计值 方法:该研究比较了ISA-Capital 2008(在圣保罗进行的一项家庭调查)中的数据,根据社会人口统计学特征,并测量了根据这些估计得出的差异。圣保罗大学(USP),坎皮纳斯大学(UNICAMP)和州卫生局(在市卫生局的支持下),以及VIGITEL-圣保罗,电话慢性疾病的风险和保护因素的基础监测。根据调查类型(家庭/电话),通过针对年龄和教育程度进行了调整的Poisson回归,比较了子宫颈抹片检查和乳房X线照片的估计值以及在访谈前一年中的估计值。 结果:< / b> VIGITEL和ISA-Capital在访谈前一年中的乳房X线检查患病率之间的估计值之间没有统计学上的显着差异。但是,对巴氏涂片的全球估计至少是一生和过去一年一次,而乳头虫至少一生一次,在统计学上显示出显着差异,电话采访的受访者覆盖率更高。 < b>结论:结果表明电话调查数据中的乳房X线照片和子宫颈抹片检查的覆盖率有高估的趋势,这表明需要进行新的研究,以便更好地理解不同类型的调查所观察到的差异。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号