...
首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >Peripheral dose measurements in cervical cancer radiotherapy: a comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and step-and-shoot IMRT techniques
【24h】

Peripheral dose measurements in cervical cancer radiotherapy: a comparison of volumetric modulated arc therapy and step-and-shoot IMRT techniques

机译:子宫颈癌放疗中的外周剂量测量:容积调制弧光治疗与IMRT步调射击技术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the peripheral doses resulting from volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) techniques in cervical cancer radiotherapy. Methods Nine patients with cervical cancer had treatment planned with both VMAT and IMRT. A specially designed phantom was used for this study, with ion chambers placed at interest points approximating the position of the breast, thyroid, and lens. The peripheral doses at the phantom interest points were measured and compared between the VMAT and IMRT techniques. Results VMAT provides a potential dosimetric advantage compared with IMRT. The mean (± standard deviation) peripheral dose to the breast point for 1 fraction (2 Gy) during VMAT measured 5.13 ± 0.96 mGy, compared with 9.04 ± 1.50 mGy for IMRT. At the thyroid and lens interest points, the mean (± standard deviation) peripheral dose during VMAT was 2.19 ± 0.33 and 2.16 ± 0.28 mGy, compared with 7.07 ± 0.76 and 6.97 ± 0.91 mGy for IMRT, respectively. VMAT reduced the monitor units used by 28% and shortened the treatment delivery time by 54% compared with IMRT. Conclusion While the dosimetric results are similar for both techniques, VMAT results in a lower peripheral dose to the patient and reduces the monitor-unit usage and treatment delivery time compared with IMRT.
机译:目的这项研究的目的是研究宫颈癌放射治疗中由容积调制弧光治疗(VMAT)和强度调制放射治疗(IMRT)技术产生的外周剂量。方法9例宫颈癌患者均已计划VMAT和IMRT进行治疗。这项研究使用了专门设计的幻像,将离子室放置在与乳房,甲状腺和晶状体位置近似的兴趣点上。测量了幻影兴趣点的周围剂量,并在VMAT和IMRT技术之间进行了比较。结果与IMRT相比,VMAT具有潜在的剂量优势。 VMAT期间,乳房部位1个分数(2 Gy)的平均末梢剂量(±标准偏差)为5.13±0.96 mGy,而IMRT为9.04±1.50 mGy。在甲状腺和晶状体的兴趣点,VMAT期间的平均外周剂量(±标准偏差)为2.19±0.33和2.16±0.28 mGy,而IMRT分别为7.07±0.76和6.97±0.91 mGy。与IMRT相比,VMAT减少了28%的监护仪使用量,并缩短了54%的治疗时间。结论虽然两种技术的剂量学结果相似,但与IMRT相比,VMAT可以降低患者的外周剂量,并减少监护仪的使用和治疗时间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号