...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista colombiana de sociología >Encuentros y divergencias en torno a las obras La distinción. Criterio y bases sociales del gusto y Campesinos de los Andes: estudio sociológico de Saucío
【24h】

Encuentros y divergencias en torno a las obras La distinción. Criterio y bases sociales del gusto y Campesinos de los Andes: estudio sociológico de Saucío

机译:围绕Ladistinción作品的遭遇和分歧。安第斯山脉的品位和农民的标准和社会基础:索奇的社会学研究

获取原文
           

摘要

The present text presents a comparative analysis between two fundamental works?f the respective authors: Peasant Society in the Colombian Andes: a Sociological Study of?Saucío by Orlando Fals Borda and Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgment of Taste?by Pierre Bourdieu. The article aims to establish convergences and divergences between?such different pieces of research, whose methodologies are nonetheless similar. Halfway?through the twentieth century, in the context of contemporary sociology’s boom and configuration,?it is no wonder that in places as different as rural Colombia and urban France?the necessity arose to study the differences in the levels of belonging to a social class and the?positioning within this, recurrent aspects in both texts. For example, the characteristics of?physical space (Fals Borda) and symbolic space (Bourdieu), and their “becomings” in what?Bourdieu called classification and declassification are criteria also investigated by the Colombian?sociologist under his own concepts. The results are responses to the necessity of a diagnosis: to know what happens in rural Andean society, on the one hand, and in?French society, on the other, from phenomena and places as elementary as the school and the local store of Saucío to the expansion of the educative levels and scopes. In order?to reach their objectives, the authors had to review society and to review themselves to understand such complex and diffuse categories as lifestyles reflected in music, home?decoration/utensils and all types of material and symbolic inventory. With this base, the?authors were able to understand the configuration of all type of social relations and the?positioning of individuals and agents. Although the geospatial and epistemological places?are different, both works are sociologically all-encompassing, as each is a form of understanding?the rural world and the urban one by questioning the way in which society and?community recognize themselves.
机译:本文对两篇基本著作进行了比较分析,分别来自各自的作者:哥伦比亚安第斯山脉的农民社会:奥兰多·福尔斯·博尔达和Distinction对Saucío的社会学研究。皮埃尔·布迪厄(Pierre Bourdieu)对品味判断的社会批判。本文的目的是建立这种不同研究之间的趋同和分歧,但其研究方法却相似。在整个二十世纪中叶,在当代社会学的繁荣和结构背景下,难怪在像哥伦比亚农村和法国城市这样的地方,有必要研究社会阶层归属水平的差异。以及这两个文本中这些经常出现的方面的位置。例如,哥伦比亚社会学家也根据他自己的概念研究了物理空间(Fals Borda)和符号空间(Bourdieu)的特征,以及它们在“布迪厄”中所谓的“分类”和“反分类”的“成因”。结果是对诊断的必要性的回应:一方面了解农村安第斯社会的情况,另一方面了解法国社会的情况,从学校和索奇当地商店等基本现象和地点扩大教育水平和范围。为了实现他们的目标,作者必须回顾社会并进行自我反思,以理解诸如音乐中反映的生活方式,家庭装饰/器皿以及所有类型的材料和象征性清单之类的复杂而分散的类别。在此基础上,作者能够了解所有类型的社会关系的结构以及个人和代理的位置。尽管地理空间和认识论的地方不同,但两种作品在社会学上都是无所不包的,因为它们都是通过质疑社会和社区认识自己的方式来理解农村世界和城市世界的一种形式。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号