...
首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing >Cost-Effectiveness of Seven Approaches to Map Vegetation Communities — A Case Study from Northern Australia’s Tropical Savannas
【24h】

Cost-Effectiveness of Seven Approaches to Map Vegetation Communities — A Case Study from Northern Australia’s Tropical Savannas

机译:七种方法来绘制植被群落的成本效益—以北澳大利亚的热带稀树草原为例

获取原文
           

摘要

Vegetation communities are traditionally mapped from aerial photography interpretation. Other semi-automated methods include pixel- and object-based image analysis. While these methods have been used for decades, there is a lack of comparative research. We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of seven approaches to map vegetation communities in a northern Australia’s tropical savanna environment. The seven approaches included: (1). aerial photography interpretation, (2). pixel-based image-only classification (Maximum Likelihood Classifier), (3). pixel-based integrated classification (Maximum Likelihood Classifier), (4). object-based image-only classification (nearest neighbor classifier), (5). object-based integrated classification (nearest neighbor classifier), (6). object-based image-only classification (step-wise ruleset), and (7). object-based integrated classification (step-wise ruleset). Approach 1 was applied to 1:50,000 aerial photography and approaches 2–7 were applied to SPOT5 and Landsat5 TM multispectral data. The integrated approaches (3, 5 and 7) included ancillary data (a digital elevation model, slope model, normalized difference vegetation index and hydrology information). The cost-effectiveness was assessed taking into consideration the accuracy and costs associated with each classification approach and image dataset. Accuracy was assessed in terms of overall accuracy and the costs were evaluated using four main components: field data acquisition and preparation, image data acquisition and preparation, image classification and accuracy assessment. Overall accuracy ranged from 28%, for the image-only pixel-based approach, to 67% for the aerial photography interpretation, while total costs ranged from AU$338,000 to AU$388,180 (Australian dollars), for the pixel-based image-only classification and aerial photography interpretation respectively. The most labor-intensive component was field data acquisition and preparation, followed by image data acquisition and preparation, classification and accuracy assessment.
机译:传统上,植被群落是根据航空摄影的解释绘制的。其他半自动方法包括基于像素和对象的图像分析。尽管这些方法已经使用了数十年,但缺乏比较研究。我们评估了在澳大利亚北部热带稀树草原环境中绘制植被群落的七种方法的成本效益。七种方法包括:(1)。航空摄影的解释,(2)。基于像素的仅图像分类(最大似然分类器),(3)。基于像素的集成分类(最大似然分类器),(4)。基于对象的仅图像分类(最近邻分类器),(5)。基于对象的综合分类(最近邻分类器),(6)。基于对象的仅图像分类(逐步规则集),以及(7)。基于对象的集成分类(逐步规则集)。方法1适用于1:50,000航空摄影,方法2–7适用于SPOT5和Landsat5 TM多光谱数据。综合方法(3、5和7)包括辅助数据(数字高程模型,坡度模型,归一化差异植被指数和水文学信息)。评估成本效益时要考虑与每种分类方法和图像数据集相关的准确性和成本。根据总体准确性评估准确性,并使用四个主要组件评估成本:现场数据获取和准备,图像数据获取和准备,图像分类和准确性评估。对于基于像素的仅图像分类,总体精度介于28%(对于仅基于像素的方法而言)至67%(对于航拍解释),而总成本在338,000澳元至388,180澳元(澳元)之间。和航空摄影的解释。劳动强度最大的部分是现场数据采集和准备,其次是图像数据采集和准备,分类和准确性评估。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号