首页> 外文期刊>Remote Sensing >Comparing Three Approaches of Evapotranspiration Estimation in Mixed Urban Vegetation: Field-Based, Remote Sensing-Based and Observational-Based Methods
【24h】

Comparing Three Approaches of Evapotranspiration Estimation in Mixed Urban Vegetation: Field-Based, Remote Sensing-Based and Observational-Based Methods

机译:混合城市植被蒸发蒸腾估算的三种方法比较:基于场,基于遥感和基于观测的方法

获取原文
       

摘要

Despite being the driest inhabited continent, Australia has one of the highest per capita water consumptions in the world. In addition, instead of having fit-for-purpose water supplies (using different qualities of water for different applications), highly treated drinking water is used for nearly all of Australia’s urban water supply needs, including landscape irrigation. The water requirement of urban landscapes, particularly urban parklands, is of growing concern. The estimation of evapotranspiration (ET) and subsequently plant water requirements in urban vegetation needs to consider the heterogeneity of plants, soils, water, and climate characteristics. This research contributes to a broader effort to establish sustainable irrigation practices within the Adelaide Parklands in Adelaide, South Australia. In this paper, two practical ET estimation approaches are compared to a detailed Soil Water Balance (SWB) analysis over a one year period. One approach is the Water Use Classification of Landscape Plants (WUCOLS) method, which is based on expert opinion on the water needs of different classes of landscape plants. The other is a remote sensing approach based on the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) from Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors on the Terra satellite. Both methods require knowledge of reference ET calculated from meteorological data. The SWB determined that plants consumed 1084 mm·yr ?1 of water in ET with an additional 16% lost to drainage past the root zone, an amount sufficient to keep salts from accumulating in the root zone. ET by MODIS EVI was 1088 mm·yr ?1 , very close to the SWB estimate, while WUCOLS estimated the total water requirement at only 802 mm·yr ?1 , 26% lower than the SWB estimate and 37% lower than the amount actually added including the drainage fraction. Individual monthly ET by MODIS was not accurate, but these errors were cancelled out to give good agreement on an annual time step. We conclude that the MODIS EVI method can provide accurate estimates of urban water requirements in mixed landscapes large enough to be sampled by MODIS imagery with 250-m resolution such as parklands and golf courses.
机译:尽管澳大利亚是最干旱的人居大陆,但其人均用水量却是世界上最高的国家之一。此外,除了拥有适合用途的供水(使用不同质量的水用于不同应用)以外,经过高度处理的饮用水几乎可以满足澳大利亚所有城市供水需求,包括景观灌溉。人们日益关注城市景观尤其是城市公园景观的水需求。估算城市植被中的蒸散量(ET)和随后的植物需水量需要考虑植物,土壤,水和气候特征的异质性。这项研究为在南澳大利亚州阿德莱德市的阿德莱德公园地区建立可持续灌溉实践做出了更大努力。在本文中,将两种实用的ET估算方法与一年内详细的土壤水平衡(SWB)分析进行了比较。一种方法是景观植物的用水分类(WUCOLS)方法,该方法基于对不同类别景观植物的水需求的专家意见。另一种是基于Terra卫星上中等分辨率成像光谱仪(MODIS)传感器的增强植被指数(EVI)的遥感方法。两种方法都需要了解根据气象数据计算出的参考ET。 SWB确定植物在ET中消耗了1084 mm·yr?1的水,另外有16%的水分流失到根区之外,这足以防止盐在根区中积聚。 MODIS EVI的ET为1088 mm·yr?1,非常接近SWB的估算,而WUCOLS估算的总需水量仅为802 mm·yr?1,比SWB的估算低26%,比实际量低37%添加包括排水分数。 MODIS进行的每个月ET的计算并不准确,但是这些错误被抵消了,从而在年度时间上达成了一致。我们得出结论,MODIS EVI方法可以提供混合景观中城市用水需求的准确估算,该景观足够大,可以用分辨率为250 m的MODIS图像(如公园和高尔夫球场)进行采样。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号