首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion
【24h】

Sovereignty of the Living Individual: Emerson and James on Politics and Religion

机译:活人的主权:爱默生和詹姆士谈政治与宗教

获取原文
           

摘要

William James and Ralph Waldo Emerson are both committed individualists. However, in what do their individualisms consist and to what degree do they resemble each other? This essay demonstrates that James’s individualism is strikingly similar to Emerson’s. By taking James’s own understanding of Emerson’s philosophy as a touchstone, I argue that both see individualism to consist principally in self-reliance, receptivity, and vocation. Putting these two figures’ understandings of individualism in comparison illuminates under-appreciated aspects of each figure, for example, the political implications of their individualism, the way that their religious individuality is politically engaged, and the importance of exemplarity to the politics and ethics of both of them.
机译:威廉·詹姆斯和拉尔夫·沃尔多·爱默生都是坚定的个人主义者。但是,他们的个人主义由什么组成,它们在何种程度上相似?本文表明,詹姆斯的个人主义与爱默生的极为相似。通过将詹姆斯自己对爱默生哲学的理解作为试金石,我认为双方都认为个人主义主要在于自力更生,乐于接受和乐于助人。将这两个人物对个人主义的理解进行比较,就可以发现每个人物的未被充分理解的方面,例如,他们的个人主义的政治含义,他们的宗教个性在政治上的参与方式以及模范化对人的政治和道德的重要性。两个都。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号