首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Sinicizing Religions, Sinicizing Religious Studies
【24h】

Sinicizing Religions, Sinicizing Religious Studies

机译:中国化宗教,中国化宗教研究

获取原文
       

摘要

From 2015 onwards, “sinicizing religions” has become the mantra of China’s religious policy, inspiring new regulations and constraining the functioning of religious organizations. After summarizing the “sinicization” doctrine and policy, this paper examines how Chinese scholars in religious studies position themselves in such a context. It reviews the developments of the field after 1979; it appraises the complex interplay between the scholarly community and policy makers; it examines how scholars in religious studies now respond to the official policy, as they strive to balance descriptive and prescriptive assessments. It shows how the search for ideal-types as well as for ‘sinicized’ typologies and methodologies partly function as an adaptative tactic. The need to answer political imperatives revives older debates on religious forms and functions, and, to some extent, stirs theoretical imagination. However, political constraints make it difficult for scholars to focus on current religious trends, as they find it safer to debate on a somewhat atemporal model of “Chinese religion”.
机译:从2015年开始,“中国化宗教”已成为中国宗教政策的口头禅,它激发了新的法规并限制了宗教组织的运作。在总结了“中国化”的学说和政策之后,本文考察了中国宗教研究学者如何在这样的背景下定位自己。它回顾了1979年以后该领域的发展;它评估了学术界和决策者之间复杂的相互作用;它考察了宗教研究学者在努力平衡描述性评估和描述性评估时,如何回应官方政策。它显示了对理想类型以及“中国化”类型和方法论的搜索如何部分作为一种适应性策略。回答政治命令的需要使关于宗教形式和功能的较早的辩论得以复兴,并且在一定程度上激起了理论上的想象。然而,政治上的限制使学者们难以集中精力关注当前的宗教趋势,因为他们发现就某种时空的“中国宗教”模式进行辩论更为安全。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号