首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology
【24h】

Passing through Customs: Merold Westphal, Richard Kearney, and the Methodological Boundaries between Philosophy of Religion and Theology

机译:穿越风俗:梅洛德·韦斯特法尔(Merold Westphal),理查德·科尼(Richard Kearney),以及宗教哲学与神学之间的方法论边界

获取原文
       

摘要

Continental philosophers of religion and the theologians who engage with them have recently began to blur the lines between the disciplines of philosophy and theology. This is particularly true after the so-called “theological turn” in phenomenology. I argue for an appreciation of their approaches but will also express that these explorations must remain interdisciplinary. Far too often philosophers and theologians alike appropriate freely within their interdisciplinary research with little regard for the presuppositions and methodologies latent within their appropriations. This article will demonstrate these appropriations through an exploration of Merold Westphal and Richard Kearney’s use of hermeneutical phenomenology, and will claim that their use of this methodology falls upon two distinct discourses, a theological one for Westphal and a philosophical one for Kearney. The upshot of this exploration is an argument for a renewal of methodological restraint when appropriating from other disciplines and a respect for the difference between academic disciplines.
机译:大陆宗教哲学家和与之接触的神学家最近开始模糊哲学与神学学科之间的界线。在现象学中所谓的“神学转向”之后尤其如此。我主张赞赏他们的方法,但同时也表示这些探索必须保持跨学科的。哲学家和神学家们经常在他们的跨学科研究中自由地适当地考虑,而很少考虑到其拨款中可能存在的前提和方法论。本文将通过探讨梅洛德·韦斯特法尔和理查德·科尔尼对诠释学现象学的运用来证明这些拨款,并声称他们对这种方法论的使用取决于两种不同的论述,一种是针对韦斯特法尔的神学观点,另一种是针对科尔尼的哲学思想。这项探索的结果是,有人主张在从其他学科中挪用时要重新采用方法论上的约束,并要尊重学科之间的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号