首页> 外文期刊>Religions >The Presbyterian Church and Zionism Unsettled: Its Antecedents, and Its Antisemitic Legacy
【24h】

The Presbyterian Church and Zionism Unsettled: Its Antecedents, and Its Antisemitic Legacy

机译:长老会和犹太复国主义尚未解决:其前身和反犹太遗产

获取原文
           

摘要

The new millennium has seen increased hostility to Israel among many progressive constituencies, including several mainline Protestant churches. The evangelical community in the US remains steadfastly Zionist, so overall support for financial aid to Israel remain secure. But the cultural impact of accusations that Israel is a settler colonialist or apartheid regime are nonetheless serious; they are proving sufficient to make support for the Jewish state a political issue for the first time in many decades. Despite a general movement in emphasis from theology to politics in church debate, there remain theological issues at the center of church discussion. The Protestant church with the longest running and most well-funded anti-Zionist constituency is the Presbyterian church in the US. In the last decade, its Israel/Palestine Mission Network (IPMN) has produced several increasingly anti-Zionist books designed to propel divestment resolutions in the church’s annual meeting. The most widely debated of these was 2014’s Zionism Unsettled: A Congregational Study Guide. This essay mounts a detailed analysis and critique of the book which documents the IPMN’s steady movement toward antisemitic positions. Among the theological issues underlying debate in Protestant denominations are the status of the divine covenant with the Jewish people, the role that the gift of land has as part of that covenant, and the nature of the characterization of the Jews as a “chosen people”. These, and other issues underlying Protestant anti-Zionism, have led to the formation of Presbyterians for Middle East Peace (PFMP), a group, unlike IPMN, that supports a two-state solution. The competing positions these groups have taken are of interest to all who want to track the role that Christian denominations have played in debates about the Israeli–Palestinian conflict.
机译:新千年以来,在许多进步的选民中,包括几条主线的新教教堂,对以色列的敌意有所增加。美国的福音派团体仍然坚定地是犹太复国主义者,因此对以色列的财政援助的总体支持仍然是安全的。但是,指责以色列是定居者的殖民主义或种族隔离政权的文化影响仍然很严重。事实证明,它们足以使对犹太国家的支持成为几十年来的第一次政治问题。尽管在教会辩论中有从神学到政治的强调运动,但神学问题仍然是教会讨论的中心。新教教堂是美国长老会教堂,拥有最长的运作和资金最雄厚的反犹太复国主义选区。在过去十年中,其以色列/巴勒斯坦宣教网络(IPMN)制作了越来越多的反犹太复国主义书籍,旨在推动教堂年会上的撤资决议。其中争议最广的是2014年的《犹太复国主义悬而未决:公理研究指南》。本文对这本书进行了详细的分析和评论,该书记录了IPMN向反犹太主义立场的稳步发展。在新教派别辩论中涉及的神学问题包括与犹太人的神圣盟约的地位,土地赠与作为该盟约的一部分的角色,以及犹太人被描述为“被选民”的性质。 。这些以及其他新教徒反犹太复国主义的问题导致了长老会为中东和平(PFMP)的成立,该组织与IPMN不同,支持两国解决方案。这些团体所采取的竞争立场对所有希望追踪基督教派别在有关以巴冲突的辩论中所扮演的角色的人都感兴趣。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号