首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology >Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope TM ) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study
【24h】

Different effectiveness of closed embryo culture system with time-lapse imaging (EmbryoScope TM ) in comparison to standard manual embryology in good and poor prognosis patients: a prospectively randomized pilot study

机译:与标准人工胚胎学相比,采用延时成像(EmbryoScope TM)的封闭式胚胎培养系统在预后良好和不良的患者中具有不同的有效性:一项前瞻性随机研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background Previously manual human embryology in many in vitro fertilization (IVF) centers is rapidly being replaced by closed embryo incubation systems with time-lapse imaging. Whether such systems perform comparably to manual embryology in different IVF patient populations has, however, never before been investigated. We, therefore,?prospectively compared embryo quality following closed system culture with time-lapse photography (EmbryoScope?) and standard embryology. We performed a two-part prospectively randomized study in IVF (clinical trial # NCT92256309). Part A involved 31 infertile poor prognosis patients prospectively randomized to EmbryoScope? and standard embryology. Part B involved embryos from 17 egg donor-recipient cycles resulting in large egg/embryo numbers, thus permitting prospectively alternative embryo assignments to EmbryoScope? and standard embryology. We then compared pregnancy rates and embryo quality on day-3 after fertilization and embryologist time utilized per processed embryo. Results Part A revealed in poor prognosis patients no differences in day-3 embryo scores, implantation and clinical pregnancy rates between EmbryoScope? and standard embryology. The EmbryoScope?, however, more than doubled embryology staff time ( P Conclusions Though due to small patient numbers preliminary, this study raises concerns about the mostly uncontrolled introduction of closed incubation systems with time lapse imaging into routine clinical embryology. Appropriately designed and powered prospectively randomized studies appear urgently needed in well-defined patient populations before the uncontrolled utilization of these instruments further expands. Trial registration NCT02246309 Registered September 18, 2014.
机译:背景技术以前,许多体外受精(IVF)中心的人工人类胚胎学正迅速被具有延时成像功能的封闭式胚胎培养系统所取代。但是,这种系统在不同的IVF患者群体中是否与手动胚胎学相比具有可比性,因此从未进行过研究。因此,我们“将封闭系统培养后的胚胎质量与延时摄影(EmbryoScope”)和标准胚胎学进行了比较。我们在IVF中进行了分为两部分的前瞻性随机研究(临床试验#NCT92256309)。 A部分涉及31名前瞻性随机分配到EmbryoScope?和标准胚胎学。 B部分涉及来自17个卵子供体-受体循环的胚胎,从而导致较大的卵子/胚数,从而使前瞻性地将胚胎分配给EmbryoScope?和标准胚胎学。然后,我们比较了受精后第3天的怀孕率和胚胎质量以及每个处理过的胚胎所花费的胚胎学家时间。结果A部分显示在预后差的患者中,EmbryoScope在第3天的胚胎评分,植入和临床妊娠率方面没有差异。和标准胚胎学。然而,EmbryoScope?的胚胎学工作时间增加了一倍以上(P结论尽管由于初步患者人数少,但这项研究引起了人们的关注,即在常规临床胚胎学中几乎没有控制地引入了具有延时成像功能的封闭式培养系统。明确定义的患者群迫切需要进行随机研究,然后才能进一步扩大对这些仪器的不可控制的使用范围,试验注册号NCT02246309,于2014年9月18日注册。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号