...
首页> 外文期刊>Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology >Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center - a pilot study
【24h】

Obstetric and perinatal outcomes in IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center - a pilot study

机译:三级医疗中心的IVF与ICSI设想的妊娠的产科和围产期结局-一项试点研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background Although most pregnancies after IVF result in normal healthy outcomes, an increased risk for a number of obstetric and neonatal complications, compared to naturally conceived pregnancies, has been reported. While there are many studies that compare pregnancies after assisted reproductive techniques with spontaneously conceived pregnancies, fewer data are available that evaluate the differences between IVF and ICSI-conceived pregnancies. The aim of our present study was, therefore, to compare obstetric and perinatal outcomes in pregnancies conceived after in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus intracytoplasmatic sperm injection (ICSI). Methods Three-hundred thirty four women who had become pregnant after an IVF or ICSI procedure resulted in a total of 530 children referred between 2003 und 2009 to the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical University of Vienna, a tertiary care center, and were included in this retrospective cohort study. We assessed maternal and fetal parameters in both groups (IVF and ICSI). The main study outcomes were preterm delivery, the need for neonatal intensive care, and congenital malformations. Moreover, we compared the course of pregnancy between both groups and the occurrence of complications that led to maternal hospitalization during pregnancy. Results There were 80 children conceived via ICSI and 450 children conceived via IVF. Mean gestational age was significantly lower in the ICSI group (p?=?0.001). After ICSI, the birth weight (p?=?0.008) and the mean APGAR values after 1?minute and after 10?minutes were lower compared to that of the IVF group (p?=?0.016 and p?=?0.047, respectively). Moreover, ICSI-conceived children had to be hospitalized more often at a neonatal intensive care unit (p?=?0.004). There was no difference in pH of the umbilical artery or in major congenital malformations between the two groups. Pregnancy complications (i.e., premature rupture of membranes, cervical insufficiency, and premature uterine contractions) and the need for maternal hospitalization during pregnancy were found significantly more often after IVF (p?=?0.0016 and p?=?0.0095, respectively), compared to the ICSI group. Conclusions When comparing IVF versus ICSI-conceived pregnancies at a tertiary care center, we found the course of pregnancy to be more complicated after IVF, whereas the primary fetal outcome seemed to be better in this group than after ICSI treatment.
机译:背景技术尽管体外受精后的大多数怀孕都能带来正常的健康结果,但与自然怀孕相比,已报道了许多产科和新生儿并发症的风险增加。尽管有许多研究将辅助生殖技术后妊娠与自然怀孕进行了比较,但评估IVF和ICSI怀孕之间差异的数据较少。因此,本研究的目的是比较体外受精(IVF)与胞浆内精子注射(ICSI)后怀孕的产科和围产期结局。方法2003年至2009年间,三百四十四名在试管婴儿或ICSI手术后怀孕的妇女导致总共530名儿童被转诊至维也纳医科大学三级护理中心的妇产科。包括在这项回顾性队列研究中。我们评估了两组(IVF和ICSI)的孕产妇和胎儿参数。主要的研究结果是早产,新生儿重症监护的需要和先天性畸形。此外,我们比较了两组的妊娠历程和导致孕期住院的并发症的发生率。结果共有80名儿童通过ICSI受孕,450名儿童通过IVF受孕。 ICSI组的平均胎龄明显降低(p = 0.001)。 ICSI后,出生体重(p = 0.008)和1分钟和10分钟后的平均APGAR值均低于IVF组(p = 0.016和p = 0.047)。 )。此外,受ICSI启发的儿童必须更频繁地在新生儿重症监护病房住院(p = 0.004)。两组的脐动脉pH或主要先天性畸形没有差异。与IVF后相比,发现妊娠并发症(即胎膜早破,宫颈机能不全和子宫过早收缩)和妊娠期间孕妇住院的发生率显着更高(分别为p?= 0.0016和p?= 0.0095)。加入ICSI组。结论在三级护理中心比较IVF与ICSI怀孕时,我们发现IVF后妊娠的过程更加复杂,而该组的主要胎儿结局似乎比ICSI治疗后更好。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号