...
首页> 外文期刊>Research journal of applied science, engineering and technology >Analyzing Medium Access Techniques in Wireless Body Area Networks
【24h】

Analyzing Medium Access Techniques in Wireless Body Area Networks

机译:分析无线人体局域网中的媒体访问技术

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper presents comparison of Access Techniques used in Medium Access Control (MAC) protocol for Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs). Comparison is performed between Time Division Multiple Access (TDMA), Frequency Division Multiple Access (FDMA), Carrier Sense Multiple Access with Collision Avoidance (CSMA/CA), Pure ALOHA and Slotted ALOHA (S-ALOHA). Performance metrics used for comparison are Throughput (T), Delay (D) and Offered Load (G). The main goal for comparison is to show which technique gives highest Throughput and lowest Delay with increase in Load. Energy efficiency is major issue in WBAN that is why there is need to know which technique performs best for energy conservation and also gives minimum delay. Simulations are performed for different scenarios and results are compared for all techniques. We suggest TDMA as best technique to be used in MAC protocol for WBANs due to its high throughput and minimum delay with increase in load. MATLAB is the tool that is used for simulation.
机译:本文介绍了用于无线人体局域网(WBAN)的媒体访问控制(MAC)协议中使用的访问技术的比较。在时分多址(TDMA),频分多址(FDMA),带冲突避免的载波侦听多路访问(CSMA / CA),纯ALOHA和时隙ALOHA(S-ALOHA)之间进行比较。用于比较的性能指标是吞吐量(T),延迟(D)和提供的负载(G)。比较的主要目的是显示哪种技术随着负载的增加提供最高的吞吐量和最低的延迟。能源效率是WBAN中的主要问题,这就是为什么需要知道哪种技术在节能方面表现最好,同时也将延迟最小化。针对不同场景执行仿真,并比较所有技术的结果。我们建议将TDMA作为WBAN的MAC协议中使用的最佳技术,因为它具有高吞吐量和随负载增加的最小延迟。 MATLAB是用于仿真的工具。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号