...
首页> 外文期刊>Research Journal of Biological Sciences >AV Interval and Cardiac Output in Patients with Implanted DDD Pacemaker
【24h】

AV Interval and Cardiac Output in Patients with Implanted DDD Pacemaker

机译:植入DDD起搏器的患者的AV间隔和心输出量

获取原文
           

摘要

Our aim was to compare the Cardiac Output (CO), Filling Time (FT) and Myocardial Performance Index (MPI) derived optimal atrioventricular delay (AVD) and to analyze systolic and diastolic performance at every optimal AVD. We studied 32 patients with implanted DDD pacemaker, from implantation time to 6 months following PM implantation, in Tabriz Shahid Madani Heart Center. The evaluation was performed during AV sequential pacing with different programmed AVDS ranged from 100-200 ms by steps of 20-30 ms. At every AVD, the following parameters were measured: FT, mitral VTI, ET, aortic VTI, ICT and IRT. CO and FT derived optimal AVDs were significantly different (146?37 and 126?35 ms, respectively), but their difference with MPI derived optimal AVDs was not significant (130?28 ms). ICT/ET was similar at CO, FT and MPI derived optimal AVD (0.24?0.10, 0.22?0.05 and 0.20?0.07, respectively). IRT/ET ratio was similar at CO, FT and MPI derived optimal AVDs (0.46?0.14, 0.45?0.10 and 0.42?0.10, respectively).
机译:我们的目的是比较心输出量(CO),充盈时间(FT)和心肌功能指数(MPI)得出的最佳房室延迟(AVD),并分析每种最佳AVD的收缩和舒张性能。我们从大不里士·沙希德·马丹尼心脏中心研究了32例植入DDD起搏器的患者,从植入时间到PM植入后的6个月。评估是在AV连续起搏期间进行的,不同的编程AVDS范围为100-200 ms,以20-30 ms为步长。在每个AVD处,均测量以下参数:FT,二尖瓣VTI,ET,主动脉VTI,ICT和IRT。 CO和FT得出的最佳AVD差异显着(分别为146?37和126?35 ms),但与MPI得出的最佳AVD的差异不明显(130?28 ms)。在CO,FT和MPI得出最佳AVD时,ICT / ET相似(分别为0.24〜0.10、0.22〜0.05和0.20〜0.07)。在CO,FT和MPI得出的最佳AVD处,IRT / ET比率相似(分别为0.46?0.14、0.45?0.10和0.42?0.10)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号