首页> 外文期刊>Research Involvement and Engagement >Using the nominal group technique to involve young people in an evidence synthesis which explored ‘risk’ in inpatient mental healthcare
【24h】

Using the nominal group technique to involve young people in an evidence synthesis which explored ‘risk’ in inpatient mental healthcare

机译:使用名义小组技术让年轻人参与证据综合研究,探索住院精神保健的“风险”

获取原文
       

摘要

Plain language summaryWe conducted a review of research on the topic of ‘risk’ in hospital based mental health care for young people aged 11-18. We wanted to include a contribution from young people alongside other stakeholders with expertise to guide the research team in decisions made setting parameters for the review. To achieve this, we held a stakeholder group meeting. We used the nominal group technique, a method designed to create a structure and a process for getting feedback from a group of people in a way that allows everyone to have an equal say. In this study, we show how our use of this approach enabled our stakeholder group to shape the focus of our study towards an area of more importance and relevance to them.BackgroundIn this paper we demonstrate how our application of the nominal group technique was used as a method of involving young people with previous experience of using inpatient mental health services in an evidence synthesis.MethodsNominal group technique is an approach to group decision-making that places weight on all participants having an equal opportunity to express a view, and to influence decisions which are made. It is an effective way to enable people who might otherwise be excluded from decision-making to contribute.ResultsIn this study, the focus of the evidence synthesis was significantly shaped following using the nominal group technique in our stakeholder advisory group meeting. The young people present in the group invited the research group to think differently about which ‘risks’ were important, to consider how young people conceptualised risk differently, focussing on risks with long term impact and quality of life implications, rather than immediate clinical risks.ConclusionsUsing the nominal group technique with young people did offer a method of promoting the equality of decision making within a stakeholder advisory group to an evidence synthesis project, but care needs to be taken to invite sufficient young people to attend so they can be proportionally represented.
机译:简短的语言摘要我们对医院中针对11至18岁年轻人的“风险”主题中的“风险”进行了研究综述。我们希望将年轻人以及其他利益相关者的贡献包括在内,以指导研究团队制定为审查设定参数的决策。为此,我们召开了利益相关者小组会议。我们使用了名义上的小组技术,这是一种旨在创建结构的过程,并且通过一种使每个人都有平等发言权的方式从一群人那里获得反馈的过程。在这项研究中,我们展示了我们如何使用这种方法使利益相关者小组将研究重点转移到与他们更加重要和相关的领域。方法名义群体技术是一种群体决策的方法,它使所有具有平等机会表达观点并影响决策的参与者具有权重制成的。结果是本研究的结果,在我们的利益相关者咨询小组会议上使用名义小组技术后,证据综合的重点明显受到影响。小组中的年轻人邀请研究小组对哪些“风险”很重要进行不同的思考,考虑年轻人如何以不同的方式将风险概念化,重点关注具有长期影响和生活质量影响的风险,而不是眼前的临床风险。结论与年轻人一起使用名义团体技术确实提供了一种促进利益相关者咨询小组在证据综合项目中决策平等的方法,但是需要注意邀请足够的年轻人参加,以便他们能够按比例代表。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号