首页> 外文期刊>Radiologia Brasileira >Performance of diagnostic centers in the classification of opportunistic screening mammograms from the Brazilian public health system (SUS)
【24h】

Performance of diagnostic centers in the classification of opportunistic screening mammograms from the Brazilian public health system (SUS)

机译:诊断中心在巴西公共卫生系统(SUS)的机会性乳腺X线照片分类中的表现

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective To evaluate the performance of diagnostic centers in the classification of mammography reports from an opportunistic screening undertaken by the Brazilian public health system (SUS) in the municipality of Goiânia, GO, Brazil in 2010. Materials and Methods The present ecological study analyzed data reported to the Sistema de Informação do Controle do Câncer de Mama (SISMAMA) (Breast Cancer Management Information System) by diagnostic centers involved in the mammographic screening developed by the SUS. Based on the frequency of mammograms per BI-RADS® category and on the limits established for the present study, the authors have calculated the rate of conformity for each diagnostic center. Diagnostic centers with equal rates of conformity were considered as having equal performance. Results Fifteen diagnostic centers performed mammographic studies for SUS and reported 31,198 screening mammograms. The performance of the diagnostic centers concerning BI-RADS classification has demonstrated that none of them was in conformity for all categories, one center presented conformity in five categories, two centers, in four categories, three centers, in three categories, two centers, in two categories, four centers, in one category, and three centers with no conformity. Conclusion The results of the present study demonstrate unevenness in the diagnostic centers performance in the classification of mammograms reported to SISMAMA from the opportunistic screening undertaken by SUS.
机译:目的通过对巴西公共卫生系统(SUS)于2010年在巴西哥伊尼亚州Goiânia市进行的机会性筛查进行评估,以评估诊断中心在乳腺X线摄影报告分类中的性能。材料和方法本生态研究分析了报告的数据由SUS开发的乳房X线检查筛查的诊断中心访问了妈妈癌症控制信息系统(SISMAMA)(乳腺癌管理信息系统)。基于每个BI-RADS®类别的乳房X线照片的频率以及为本研究确定的极限,作者计算了每个诊断中心的合格率。具有相同合格率的诊断中心被认为具有相同的性能。结果15个诊断中心对SUS进行了乳房X线照片研究,并报告了31,198例乳房X线照片。关于BI-RADS分类的诊断中心的性能表明,它们都不符合所有类别的要求,一个中心在五个类别中表示合格,两个中心在四个类别中,三个中心在三个类别中,两个中心在一个类别中。两个类别,四个中心,一个类别,三个不合格的中心。结论本研究结果表明,通过SUS进行的机会性筛查,报告给SISMAMA的X线照片在诊断中心的诊断中表现不均。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号