首页> 外文期刊>Radiologia Brasileira >Concordancia entre métodos de diagnóstico por imagem na avalia??o de linfonodomegalias em pacientes HIV(+)/AIDS
【24h】

Concordancia entre métodos de diagnóstico por imagem na avalia??o de linfonodomegalias em pacientes HIV(+)/AIDS

机译:诊断成像方法在评估HIV(+)/ AIDS患者淋巴结肿大中的一致性

获取原文
       

摘要

Objective: To assess the percent agreement between diagnostic imaging modalities for the evaluation of lymphadenopathies in HIV-infected/AIDS patients. Materials and Methods: This was an open, comparative, prospective study of diagnostic imaging methods for lymphadenopathy evaluation. We evaluated 30 patients (19 men and 11 women). All underwent ultrasound and computed tomography (CT). Twenty of the patients also underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We determined the percent agreement between two examiners using the various imaging methods to evaluate lymphadenopathies. Results: CT had the highest percent agreement, at 93.3%, with a kappa coefficient of 0.85, corresponding to 28 of the 30 examinations. When we compared the percent agreement between the two examiners and between CT and ultrasound, examiner 1 had an observed rate of 80.0%, with a kappa of 0.49, corresponding to 24 of the 30 examinations, whereas examiner 2 had a rate of 70.0%, with a kappa of 0.31, corresponding to 21 of the 30 examinations. Between MRI and CT, the percent agreement for examiner 1 was 50.0%, with a kappa of ?0.18, corresponding to 10 of the 20 examinations, whereas that for examiner 2 was 85.0%, with a kappa of 0.69, corresponding to 17 of the 20 examinations. For MRI and ultrasound, examiner 1 had a percent agreement of 70.0%, with a kappa of 0.20, corresponding to 14 of the 20 examinations, and examiner 2 had a percent agreement of 75.0%, with a kappa of 0.38, corresponding to 15 of the 20 examinations. Conclusion: This study indicates that intermethod agreement is highly dependent on the way in which the research is conducted, rather than on the level of experience of the examiner.
机译:目的:评估诊断成像方式之间的百分比一致性,以评估HIV感染/艾滋病患者的淋巴腺病。材料和方法:这是用于淋巴结病评估的诊断成像方法的开放,比较,前瞻性研究。我们评估了30例患者(19例男性和11例女性)。所有患者均接受了超声和计算机断层扫描(CT)。 20名患者还接受了磁共振成像(MRI)。我们使用各种成像方法评估淋巴腺病,确定了两名检查者之间的一致性百分比。结果:CT的一致性最高,为93.3%,卡伯系数为0.85,对应于30项检查中的28项。当我们比较两个检查者之间以及CT和超声之间的一致性百分比时,检查者1的观察率为80.0%,kappa为0.49,对应于30个检查中的24个,而检查者2的观察率为70.0%, kappa为0.31,对应于30项检查中的21项。在MRI和CT之间,检查者1的一致性百分比为50.0%,kappa为0.18,对应于20项检查中的10项,而检查者2的一致性为85.0%,kappa为0.69,对应于20项检查的kappa。 20次考试。对于MRI和超声检查,检查员1的百分一致性为70.0%,kappa为0.20,对应于20项检查中的14次检查,检查员2的百分一致性为75.0%,kappa为0.38,对应于20条检查的kappa。 20次考试。结论:这项研究表明,方法间的一致性在很大程度上取决于研究的进行方式,而不是取决于审查员的经验水平。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号