首页> 外文期刊>Literator >The evolution of critical responses to Fugard's work, culminating in a feminist reading of The Road to Mecca
【24h】

The evolution of critical responses to Fugard's work, culminating in a feminist reading of The Road to Mecca

机译:对富加德作品批判性回应的演变,最终以女权主义读物《通往麦加之路》

获取原文
       

摘要

An ongoing debate in South Africa today concerns the response of white writers, such as Athol Fugard, to the African/South African socio-historical context. As a major focus of this debate there is a relationship between history and literature, and selected critical responses to Fugard's work of the past three decades are investigated in terms of their position regarding this relationship. All these responses, regardless of their political and/or Hterary affiliations were found to imply that some kind of truth, their truth can be represented in a fictional text. In response to this implied truth claim and in particular to certain critics' demand for a “concrete” history, the founding insight of poststructuralism about the inability of language to reflect an already existing reality is used to justify the following approach to Fugard's The Road to Mecca: history is merely one discourse among many without any privileged claim to primacy; Fugard's texts, read as history, is therefore approached in the context of South African discourses competing in the game of power relations, thus justifying the feminist reading resulting from an analysis of the competing discourses in the text.
机译:今天在南非进行的辩论涉及白人作家(如阿瑟·富加德)对非洲/南非社会历史背景的反应。这场辩论的主要焦点是历史与文学之间的关系,并根据其对这种关系的立场,研究了对过去三年来福加德作品的某些批判性回应。所有这些回应,无论其政治和/或隶属关系如何,都暗示着某种真理,它们的真理可以用虚构的文本来表示。为了回应这种隐含的真理主张,尤其是对于某些批评家对“具体”历史的要求,后结构主义关于语言无法反映已经存在的现实的开创性见解被用来证明以下方法适用于富加德的《通往世界的道路》。麦加:历史只是许多人中的一种话语,没有任何特权可言。因此,在南非话语在权力关系博弈中竞争的背景下,人们将富加德的文本(称为历史)进行了研究,从而证明了对文本中竞争性话语的分析所产生的女权主义解读是正确的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号