SAMMENDRAGBakgrunn: I en tidligere studie av Arbeidstilsynets registreringer av arbeidsskaded?dsfall 2000-2003 identifisertevi – med supplering fra SSB (D?ds?rsaksregisteret) – i alt 214 d?dsfall i landbasert arbeidsliv blant bosattei Norge. Av disse var 171 (80%) registrert i Arbeidstilsynet. Komplettheten varierte med n?ring og skadetypeslik at suppleringen endret risikobildet. I denne studien har vi brukt NAVs yrkesskadedata og forsikringsselskapenesyrkesskaderegister DAYSY for ? unders?ke om ytterligere arbeidsskaded?dsfall kunne identifiseres.Metode: Yrkesskadesaker fra NAV og DAYSY med skadedato 2000-2003 og d?d innen ett ?r, ble gjennomg?ttog sammenholdt p? individniv? med opplysninger i D?ds?rsaksregisteret.Resultater: 32 nye arbeidsskaded?dsfall ble identifisert. Gjennomsnittsalderen var lavere enn for de opprinnelige214 (37 vs 46 ?r). Andelen d?dsfall p? grunn av transportulykker med personbil (ICD-10 V40-V49)var h?yere (41 vs 10%). Av de tilsammen 246 identifiserte d?dsfall hadde Arbeidstilsynet registrert 70%, NAV64%, D?ds?rsaksregisteret 57% og DAYSY 20%.Fortolkning: Tilleggsinformasjon fra NAV og DAYSY endret lite p? det opprinnelige risikobildet basert p?informasjon fra Arbeidstilsynet og D?ds?rsaksregisteret. ?kningen i totalantallet stemte med v?rt estimat basertp? to datakilder. Manglende registrering i NAV og DAYSY kan delvis skyldes at det ikke var fremmet krav fraetterlatte om yrkesskadeytelser.?Wergeland E, Gjertsen F, Lund J. Inadequate surveillance of fatal occupational injuries in Norwegian landbased activities. Nor J Epide miol 2016; 26 (1-2): 117-123.?ENGLISH SUMMARYBackground: In a previous study of fatal occupational injuries 2000-2003 registered by the Norwegian LabourInspection Authority (NLIA) and supplemented from Statistics Norway (the Cause of Death Registry, CDR), weidentified a total of 214 deaths in land based industries among residents in Norway. From these, 171 (80%) hadbeen registered by the NLIA. The completeness in the NLIA register varied according to industry and type ofinjury, so that supplementing from CDR altered the distribution of risk. In the present study we have supplementedwith two other data sources – the National Insurance Administration (NIA) and Finance Norway (FN)for private insurance companies – in order to see if further deaths from occupational injuries could be identified.Method: Cases of occupational injuries from NIA and FN with date of injury 2000-2003 and death within oneyear, were scrutinized and compared individually with information in the CDR by means of their uniquepersonal identification number.Results: 32 new cases of fatal occupational injuries were identified. The average age was lower than for theoriginal 214 (37 vs 46 years). The proportion of deaths of car occupants in transport accidents (ICD-10 V40-V49) was higher (41 vs 10%). Due to the small number added, the overall risk distribution remained the same.Of the total 246 deaths identified, the NLIA had registered 70%, NIA 64%, CDR 57% and FN 20%.Interpretation: The additional information from NIA and FN did not markedly alter the risk distribution basedon information from NIA and CDR. The increase in total number of registered deaths from four sources was inaccordance with our estimated number based on two sources. Some of the incompleteness in registration byNIA and FN indicates that not all the bereaved that were entitled to occupational injury compensation, had madesuch request.
展开▼
