...
首页> 外文期刊>LIPIcs : Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics >Approximating Activation Edge-Cover and Facility Location Problems
【24h】

Approximating Activation Edge-Cover and Facility Location Problems

机译:近似的激活边缘覆盖和设施位置问题

获取原文
           

摘要

What approximation ratio can we achieve for the Facility Location problem if whenever a client u connects to a facility v, the opening cost of v is at most theta times the service cost of u? We show that this and many other problems are a particular case of the Activation Edge-Cover problem. Here we are given a multigraph G=(V,E), a set R subseteq V of terminals, and thresholds {t^e_u,t^e_v} for each uv-edge e in E. The goal is to find an assignment a={a_v:v in V} to the nodes minimizing sum_{v in V} a_v, such that the edge set E_a={e=uv: a_u = t^e_u, a_v = t^e_v} activated by a covers R. We obtain ratio 1+max_{x=1}(ln x)/(1+x/theta)~= ln theta - ln ln theta for the problem, where theta is a problem parameter. This result is based on a simple generic algorithm for the problem of minimizing a sum of a decreasing and a sub-additive set functions, which is of independent interest. As an application, we get the same ratio for the above variant of {Facility Location}. If for each facility all service costs are identical then we show a better ratio 1+max_{k in N}(H_k-1)/(1+k/theta), where H_k=sum_{i=1}^k 1/i. For the Min-Power Edge-Cover problem we improve the ratio 1.406 of [Calinescu et al, 2019] (achieved by iterative randomized rounding) to 1.2785. For unit thresholds we improve the ratio 73/60~=1.217 of [Calinescu et al, 2019] to 1555/1347~=1.155.
机译:如果每当客户u连接到设施v时,v的开放成本至多是u服务成本的theta,我们对于设施选址问题可以达到什么近似比率?我们证明此问题和许多其他问题是激活边缘覆盖问题的特例。在这里,我们得到了一个多重图G =(V,E),一组R终端集R,以及E中每个uv-edge e的阈值{t ^ e_u,t ^ e_v}。目标是找到一个赋值a = {V中的a_v:v}到使sum_ {v in V} a_v最小化的节点,这样边缘集E_a = {e = uv:a_u> = t ^ e_u,a_v> = t ^ e_v}由封面激活R。对于问题,我们获得比率1 + max_ {x> = 1}(ln x)/(1 + x / theta)〜= ln theta-ln ln theta,其中theta是问题参数。该结果基于一个简单的通用算法,该算法可将具有独立利益的递减和子加和集合函数之和最小化。作为应用,对于{设施位置}的上述变体,我们得到相同的比率。如果对于每个设施,所有服务成本都相同,那么我们将显示出更好的比率1 + max_ {k in N}(H_k-1)/(1 + k / theta),其中H_k = sum_ {i = 1} ^ k 1 /一世。对于Min-Power Edge-Cover问题,我们将[Calinescu等人,2019]的比率1.406(通过迭代随机四舍五入取整)提高到1.2785。对于单位阈值,我们将[Calinescu et al,2019]的比率73/60〜= 1.217提高到1555/1347〜= 1.155。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号