首页> 外文期刊>Leukemia >The presence of an HLA-identical sibling donor has no impact on outcome of patients with high-risk MDS or secondary AML (sAML) treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by transplantation: results of a prospective study of the EORTC, EBMT, SAKK and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups (EORTC study 06921)
【24h】

The presence of an HLA-identical sibling donor has no impact on outcome of patients with high-risk MDS or secondary AML (sAML) treated with intensive chemotherapy followed by transplantation: results of a prospective study of the EORTC, EBMT, SAKK and GIMEMA Leukemia Groups (EORTC study 06921)

机译:与HLA相同的同胞供体的存在不会对高危MDS或继发AML的继发性AML(sAML)患者进行强化化疗并随后进行移植的结果产生影响:EORTC,EBMT,SAKK和GIMEMA白血病的前瞻性研究团体(EORTC研究06921)

获取原文
           

摘要

This report used the framework of a large European study to investigate the outcome of patients with and without an HLA-identical sibling donor on an intention-to-treat basis. After a common remission-induction and consolidation course, patients with an HLA-identical sibling donor were scheduled for allogeneic transplantation and patients lacking a donor for autologous transplantation. In all, 159 patients alive at 8 weeks from the start of treatment were included in the present analysis. In total, 52 patients had a donor, 65 patients did not have a donor and in 42 patients the availability of a donor was not assessed. Out of 52 patients, 36 (69%) with a donor underwent allogeneic transplantation (28 in CR1). Out of 65 patients, 33 (49%) received an autograft (27 in CR1). The actuarial survival rates at 4 years were 33.3% (s.e. = 6.7%) for patients with a donor and 39.0% (s.e. = 6.5%) for patients without a donor (P = 0.18). Event-free survival rates were 23.1% (s.e. = 6.2%) and 21.5% (s.e. = 5.3%), respectively (P = 0.66). Correction for alternative donor transplants did not substantially alter the survival of the group without a donor. Also, the survival in the various cytogenetic risk groups was not significantly different when comparing the donor vs the no-donor group. This analysis shows that patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome and secondary acute myeloid leukemia may benefit from both allogeneic and autologous transplantation. We were unable to demonstrate a survival advantage for patients with a donor compared to patients without a donor.
机译:该报告使用了一项大型欧洲研究的框架,以意向性治疗为基础,研究了有或没有HLA相同同胞供者的患者的结局。经过共同的缓解诱导和巩固过程后,计划将具有HLA相同同胞供体的患者安排进行异体移植,而将缺乏供体的患者进行自体移植。从本研究开始,总共有159位患者在治疗开始8周后还活着。总共有52位患者有供体,65位患者没有供体,在42位患者中未评估供体的可用性。在52例患者中,有36例(69%)供体接受了同种异体移植(CR1中为28例)。在65位患者中,有33位(49%)接受了自体移植(CR1中有27位)。有捐献者的患者在4年时的精算生存率为33.3%(s.e. = 6.7%),而没有捐献者的患者为39.0%(s.e. = 6.5%)(P = 0.18)。无事件生存率分别为23.1%(s.e. = 6.2%)和21.5%(s.e. = 5.3%)(P = 0.66)。替代供体移植的校正并没有实质性改变没有供体的人群的生存。同样,当比较供体组与无供体组时,各种细胞遗传学风险组的存活率也没有显着差异。该分析表明,高危骨髓增生异常综合征和继发性急性髓细胞性白血病的患者可能会从异体和自体移植中受益。与没有供体的患者相比,我们无法证明有供体的患者的生存优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号