...
首页> 外文期刊>Norsk Epidemiologi >Stor skilnad i forbruksprofil av antibiotika ved to universitetssykehus i Norge
【24h】

Stor skilnad i forbruksprofil av antibiotika ved to universitetssykehus i Norge

机译:挪威两家大学医院的抗生素消费情况差异很大

获取原文

摘要

SAMMENDRAGForm?let med denne studien var ? beskrive antibiotikaforbruket ved Regionsykehuset i Troms? (RiT?)og ved Aker sykehus (Aker) i perioden 1993-97. Forbruket av de ulike preparatene er presentert somDefinerte D?gndoser (DDD)/1000 ligged?gn/?r. Totalforbruket av antibiotika var relativt likt ved de tosykehusene, og varierte i perioden mellom 473 og 544 DDD/1000 ligged?gn/?r. Den st?rste skilnaden iforbruksprofilen mellom sykehusene var innen gruppen beta-laktamer. Beregnet som andel av DDD/1000 ligged?gn/?r i 1999, utgjorde denne preparatgruppen 64,5% av det totale antibiotikaforbruket vedRiT? og 74,6% av antibiotikaforbruket ved Aker. Beta-laktamase?mfintlige penicilliner var de mestbrukte preparatene ved RiT?, mens penicilliner med utvidet spekter var de mest brukte preparatene vedAker. Forbruket av penicilliner med utvidet spekter utgjorde nesten tre ganger st?rre andel av totalforbruketved Aker enn ved RiT?. Ved RiT? utgjorde forbruket av cefuroksim og tredje generasjonscefalosporiner 13,0% av det totale antibiotikaforbruket i 1999. Ved Aker var tilsvarende 4,1%. RiT?reduserte forbruket av tetracykliner over perioden, men brukte likevel betydelig mer enn Aker. Beggesykehusene reduserte forbruket av aminoglykosider. Det var lavt, men ?kende forbruk av klindamycinved begge sykehusene. Forbruket var h?yest ved RiT?. Den store skilnaden i forbruksprofil mellomsykehusene kan ikke forklares med ulike anbefalinger i veilederne for antibiotikabruk, eller medforskjell i resistensforhold blant de vanligste patogene bakteriene.Sm?brekke L.?Large differences in the use of antibiotics between two university hospitals inNorway.?Nor J Epidemiol 2001; 11 (1): 61-65. ENGLISH SUMMARYThe aim of the study was to describe the use of antibiotics at the University Hospital of Troms? (RiT?)and Aker University Hospital, Oslo (Aker) during 1993-99. The use of antibiotics is presented as DefinedDaily Dose (DDD)/1000 bed days/year. The total use of antibiotics varied between 473 and 544DDD/1000 bed days/year for the two hospitals over the period. The greatest difference in the profilebetween the hospitals was in the use of beta-lactam antibiotics. At RiT?, this group represented 64.5%and at Aker 74.6% of the total use of antibiotics. At RiT?, the use of narrow spectrum penicillinesdeclined from 128 to 93 DDD/1000 bed days/year, but was still the most used group of antibiotics. In1999 this represented 19% of the total use. At Aker, the use of aminopenicilllins varied between 164 and195 DDD/1000 bed days/year, and in 1999 this group represented 32% of the total use. At RiT?, the useof aminopenicillins varied between 49 and 67 DDD/ 1000 bed days/year, and in 1999 this represented13% of the total use. At RiT? the use of cefuroxim and third generation cephalosporines increased, andrepresented 13.0% of the total use in 1999. At Aker, the use of cefuroxim increased towards the end ofthe period, while the use of third generation cephalosporins declined. At Aker, cefu roxim and thirdgeneration cephalosporins represented 4.1% of the total use in 1999. The use of carbapenemes was lowat both hospitals, but the level of use at RiT? was twice the level at Aker. At RiT?, the use of tetracyclineswas reduced from 44 to 24 DDD/1000 bed days/year over the period, but was still higher thanat Aker. Both hospitals reduced the consumption of aminoglycosides. The use of clindamycin was low,but there was a substantial relative change during the period. The difference in the use of antibioticscannot be explained by different guidelines or different spectrum of antibiotic resistance.
机译:总结这项研究的目的是?描述在特罗姆斯地区医院的抗生素消耗量? (RiT?)在1993-97年间在阿克医院(Aker)。各种制剂的消耗量以定义的每日剂量(DDD)/ 1000床日/年表示。两家医院的抗生素总消耗量相对相似,且在473至544 DDD / 1000床日/年之间变化。两家医院之间的消费状况最大的不同是β-内酰胺类药物。按1999年DDD / 1000床日/年的比例计算,这组制剂占RIT抗生素总消费量的64.5%。和Aker的抗生素消费量的74.6%。 β-内酰胺酶敏感的青霉素是RiT使用最广泛的药物,而扩展范围的青霉素是Aker使用最广泛的药物。在Aker,青霉素的消费范围扩大了,几乎占RiT?消费总量的三倍。通过RiT?头孢呋辛和第三代头孢菌素的消费量在1999年占抗生素总消费量的13.0%。在阿克,相应的数字是4.1%。 RiT在此期间减少了四环素的消耗,但仍然比Aker花费更多。两家医院都减少了氨基糖苷的消费。两家医院的克林霉素消费量都很低,但都在增加。消费最高的是RiT?。医院之间的消费状况差异很大,不能用抗生素使用指南中的不同建议来解释,也不能通过最常见的病原菌之间的耐药性共同差异来解释。 2001年; 11(1):61-65。中文摘要该研究的目的是描述Troms大学医院的抗生素使用情况? (RiT?)和奥斯陆阿克大学医院(Aker)在1993-99年期间。抗生素的使用定义为每日定义剂量(DDD)/ 1000张床日/年。在此期间,两家医院的抗生素总使用量在473至544DDD / 1000张床日/年之间。两家医院之间最大的不同是使用β-内酰胺类抗生素。在RiT?组中,这一组占抗生素总使用量的64.5%,在Aker组中占74.6%。在RiT ?,窄谱青霉素的使用从1000 DDD /年减少到128 DDD /天,下降到93 DDD,但仍然是使用最多的抗生素。在1999年,这占总使用量的19%。在阿克(Aker),氨基青霉素的使用量在164至195 DDD / 1000床日/年之间变化,1999年,这一组占总使用量的32%。在RiT ?,氨基青霉素的使用量在49至67 DDD / 1000床日/年之间变化,1999年占总使用量的13%。在RiT?头孢呋辛和第三代头孢菌素的使用量增加,占1999年总使用量的13.0%。在阿克尔,到该期末头孢呋辛的使用量增加了,而第三代头孢菌素的使用量却减少了。在阿克(Aker),cefu roxim和第三代头孢菌素占1999年总使用量的4.1%。在两家医院中,卡宾烯的使用率都很低,但RiT的使用水平如何?是Aker的两倍。在RiT?期间,四环素的使用从1000天/年减少到44 DDD / 24 DDD /年,但仍高于Aker。两家医院都减少了氨基糖苷的消耗。克林霉素的使用率很低,但是在此期间有相当大的相对变化。不能通过不同的指导原则或不同的抗生素耐药性谱解释使用抗生素的差异。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号