...
首页> 外文期刊>Laws >Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers
【24h】

Sexual Diversity in the Judiciary in England and Wales; Research on Barriers to Judicial Careers

机译:英格兰和威尔士司法机构中的性多样性;司法职业障碍研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Debates about the diversity of the judiciary in the UK have been dominated by gender, race and ethnicity. Sexuality is notable by its absence and is perceived to pose particular challenges. It is usually missing from the list of diversity categories. When present, its appearance is nominal. One effect of this has been a total lack of official data on the sexual composition of the judiciary. Another is the gap in research on the barriers to the goal of a more sexually diverse judiciary. In 2008 the Judicial Appointment Commission (JAC) for England and Wales undertook research to better understand the challenges limiting progress towards judicial diversity. A central gaol of the project was to investigate barriers to application for judicial appointment across different groups defined by “sex, ethnicity and employment status”. Sexual orientation was again noticeable by its absence. Its absence was yet another missed opportunity to recognise and take seriously this strand of diversity. This study is based on a response to that absence. A stakeholder organisation, InterLaw Diversity Forum for lesbian gay bisexual and transgender networks in the legal services sector, with the JAC’s approval, used their questionnaire and for the first time asked lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender lawyers about the perceptions and experiences of barriers to judicial appointment. This paper examines the findings of that unique research and considers them in the light of the initial research on barriers to judicial appointment and subsequent developments.
机译:有关性别,种族和种族的争论主要集中在英国司法机构的多样性。性生活因缺乏性别而引人注目,并被认为构成了特殊的挑战。通常在多样性类别列表中是缺少的。存在时,其外观是名义上的。其结果之一是完全缺乏有关司法部门性别组成的官方数据。另一个是在实现性别多元化司法制度目标的障碍方面的研究空白。 2008年,英格兰和威尔士的司法任命委员会(JAC)进行了研究,以更好地理解限制司法多元化进展的挑战。该项目的主要目的是调查在“性别,种族和就业状况”所界定的不同群体中申请司法任命的障碍。由于没有性取向,性取向再次引起注意。它的缺席是另一个错过并认识并认真对待这种多样性的机会。这项研究基于对这种缺席的回应。一个利益相关者组织,“国际法律多样性论坛”(InterLaw Diversity Forum),用于法律服务领域的同性恋同性恋双性恋和跨性别网络,并获得了JAC的批准,使用了他们的问卷,并首次向同性恋,双性恋和跨性别的跨性别律师询问了障碍性障碍的观念和经历。司法任命。本文考察了这一独特研究的发现,并根据对司法任命障碍和后续发展的初步研究来考虑这些发现。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Laws》 |2013年第4期|共27页
  • 作者

    Leslie J. Moran;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类 法律;
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号