首页> 外文期刊>Nutrition Research and Practice >Performance of mid-upper arm circumference to diagnose acute malnutrition in a cross-sectional community-based sample of children aged 6–24 months in Niger
【24h】

Performance of mid-upper arm circumference to diagnose acute malnutrition in a cross-sectional community-based sample of children aged 6–24 months in Niger

机译:尼日尔6至24个月大的社区性横断面样本中上臂中段诊断急性营养不良的表现

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES Accurate, early identification of acutely malnourished children has the potential to reduce related child morbidity and mortality. The current World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines classify non-oedematous acute malnutrition among children under five using Mid-Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) or Weight-for-Height Z-score (WHZ). However, there is ongoing debate regarding the use of current MUAC cut-offs. This study investigates the diagnostic performance of MUAC to identify children aged 6–24 months with global (GAM) or severe acute malnutrition (SAM). SUBJECTS/METHODS Cross-sectional, secondary data from a community sample of children aged 6-24 months in Niger were used for this study. Children with complete weight, height and MUAC data and without clinical oedema were included. Using WHO guidelines for GAM (WHZ RESULTS Of 1161 children, 23.3% were diagnosed with GAM using WHZ, and 4.4% with SAM. Using current WHO cut-offs, the Se of MUAC to identify GAM was greater than for SAM (79 vs. 57%), yet the Sp was lower (84 vs. 97%). From inspection of the ROC curve and Youden Index, Se and Sp were maximised for MUAC CONCLUSIONS The current MUAC cut-off to identify GAM should continue to be used, but when screening for SAM, a higher cut-off could improve case identification.
机译:背景/目的准确,早期发现急性营养不良的儿童有可能减少相关的儿童发病率和死亡率。当前的世界卫生组织(WHO)指南使用上臂围(MUAC)或身高体重Z评分(WHZ)对五岁以下儿童中的非水肿性急性营养不良进行了分类。但是,关于使用当前MUAC截止值的争论仍在不断。这项研究调查了MUAC的诊断性能,以识别6-24个月大的全球性(GAM)或严重急性营养不良(SAM)儿童。受试者/方法本研究使用了来自尼日尔6-24个月大儿童社区样本的横断面,次要数据。包括体重,身高和MUAC数据完整且无临床水肿的儿童。根据WHO的GAM指南(WHZ结果),在1161名儿童中,使用WHZ诊断为GAM的儿童为23.3%,使用SAM诊断为4.4%。使用当前的WHO临界值,MUAC识别GAM的Se大于SAM(79 vs. 57%),但Sp较低(84%vs. 97%)。根据ROC曲线和Youden指数的检查,对于MUAC结论,Se和Sp达到了最大值。应继续使用当前的MUAC临界值来确定GAM,但是在筛查SAM时,更高的分界值可以改善病例识别。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号