...
首页> 外文期刊>Nuclear physics, B >Erratum to “Inclusive lepton production from heavy-hadron decay in pp collisions at the LHC” [Nucl. Phys. B 872 (2013) 253–264]
【24h】

Erratum to “Inclusive lepton production from heavy-hadron decay in pp collisions at the LHC” [Nucl. Phys. B 872 (2013) 253–264]

机译:对“大型强子对撞机 pp 碰撞中的强子衰变产生的包涵性轻子产生”勘误[Nucl。物理B 872(2013)253–264]

获取原文

摘要

Due to a programming mistake in the code to evaluate the fragmentation functions to leptons we had to recompute the cross sections for the production of leptons (e±,μ±) originating from charm and bottom-hadrons in the various cases. In particular we have redone the computation of Figs. 2–5 of the paper (corresponding here to Fig. 1, Fig. 2, Fig. 3, Fig. 4) with the corrected error. Concerning the comparison of the data with the corrected theoretical predictions the following remarks are needed. In Fig. 1 the data agree well with the full curve (default scale choice) in both cases, the CMS and the ALICE data. In Fig. 2, where the predictions in comparison with the ATLAS data are shown, the comparison of the data with the predictions is not so good. The data in all three figures are mostly below the predictions for the default scale choice. The comparison with the ALICE data in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 is very satisfactory. The updated plots are given here in what follows (the references in the captions of the figures are as in the paper).
机译:由于在评估轻子碎裂功能的代码中存在编程错误,我们不得不在各种情况下重新计算横截面,以生产源自魅力和底强子的轻子(e±,μ±)。特别地,我们已经重做了图1和2的计算。纸的2–5(此处对应于图1,图2,图3,图4)具有已校正的误差。关于将数据与校正后的理论预测进行比较,需要注意以下几点。在图1中,在CMS和ALICE数据这两种情况下,数据都与完整曲线(默认比例选择)非常吻合。在图2中,在示出了与ATLAS数据相比的预测的情况下,数据与预测的比较不是很好。所有三个图中的数据大多低于默认比例选择的预测。与图3和图4中的ALICE数据的比较非常令人满意。更新后的图在下面给出(附图标题中的引用与本文相同)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号