...
首页> 外文期刊>North American Journal of Medical Sciences >Efficacy of segmental stabilization exercise for lumbar segmental instability in patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized placebo controlled crossover study
【24h】

Efficacy of segmental stabilization exercise for lumbar segmental instability in patients with mechanical low back pain: A randomized placebo controlled crossover study

机译:节段性稳定运动对机械性下腰痛患者腰椎节段性不稳定的功效:一项随机安慰剂对照研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background:Lumbar segmental stability is an important biomechanical component that influences symptoms amongst patients with Mechanical low back pain.Aims:To compare the efficacy of segmental stabilization exercises utilizing multifidus and transversus abdominis muscles versus a placebo treatment in patients with lumbar segmental instability.Materials and methods:The study was an observer-blinded randomized placebo-controlled cross-over study of 18 adults (12 men, 6 women), of mean age 22.5 ± 1.09 yrs who scored 7/13 in subjective aspects and 8/14 in objective aspects of Delphi criteria for lumbar segmental instability. The selected subjects were then randomized to receive either placebo-control (prone lying) or experimental (lumbar segmental stabilization) as a first treatment. Each treatment was followed by a wash-out period of 24 hours. Outcomes were measured four times- pre- and post- first intervention, pre- and post- second intervention. The outcome measures used were pain on Visual analogue scale, Pressure pain threshold and Joint play grading scale (0-6 scale) on that level.Results:Two-way analysis of variance and post-hoc analysis using Bonferonni test were used with level of significance set at p<.05 using Statistical package for social sciences version 12.0.1 for Windows. Visual analogue scale changed significantly in both the periods of intervention- in control (P =.016) and experimental (P =.000) periods. However this improvement was more significant in the experimental period. The Joint play grading scale scores improved only in the experimental condition compared to the control condition significantly. The Pressure pain threshold also improved significantly in the experimental condition (P =.000) while the changes in control condition was not statistically significant (P=.816).Conclusion:Segmental stabilization exercise was more effective than placebo intervention in symptomatic lumbar segmental instability.
机译:背景:腰椎节段稳定性是影响机械性下腰痛患者症状的重要生物力学成分。目的:比较使用多指和腹横肌进行节段性稳定锻炼与安慰剂治疗腰椎节段性不稳定性患者的疗效。方法:这项研究是一项观察者盲的随机安慰剂对照交叉研究,研究对象为平均年龄22.5±1.09岁的18位成年人(12位男性,6位女性),主观方面得分为7/13,客观方面得分为8/14腰椎节段不稳的德尔菲标准。然后将选定的受试者随机接受安慰剂对照(俯卧)或实验(腰椎节段稳定)作为第一治疗。每次处理后都要进行24小时的冲洗。在第一次干预前后进行四次测量结果,第二次干预前后进行测量。结果:视觉模拟量表疼痛,压力痛阈值和关节疼痛分级量表(0-6量表)。结果:采用Bonferonni检验进行方差的双向分析和事后分析,水平使用用于Windows的社会科学版本12.0.1的统计软件包将显着性设置为p <.05。视觉模拟量表在干预期(P = .016)和实验期(P = .000)均发生了显着变化。但是,这种改进在实验期间更为显着。与对照相比,仅在实验条件下,联合比赛分级量表得分显着提高。在实验状态下,压力疼痛阈值也显着改善(P = .000),而对照状态的变化无统计学意义(P = .816)。结论:在症状性腰椎节段不稳中,分段稳定运动比安慰剂干预更有效。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号