首页> 外文期刊>Neurospine. >Diagnostic Value of Biopsy Techniques in Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: Percutaneous Needle Biopsy and Open Biopsy
【24h】

Diagnostic Value of Biopsy Techniques in Lumbar Spondylodiscitis: Percutaneous Needle Biopsy and Open Biopsy

机译:腰椎管炎的活检技术的诊断价值:经皮穿刺活检和开放性活检

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate and compare the diagnostic value of the open biopsy technique and the percutaneous biopsy techniques in lumbar spondylodiscitis. Methods Between January 2004 and December 2009, we retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 57 patients with infectious lumbar spondylodiscitis. The etiologic diagnosis of the infectious spondylodiscitis was obtained by two methods. Of 57 cases, twenty-seven patients underwent open biopsy and thirty patients underwent percutaneous needle biopsy including computed tomography (CT) - guided and fluoroscopy-guided needle aspiration. All biopsies were performed by experienced two neurosurgeons and one interventional radiologist. Results Of the 57 cases radiologically consistent with spinal infection, 29 (50.9%) biopsy specimens resulted in positive cultures and 28 (49.1%) returned negative cultures. According to the type of biopsy techniques, the culture-positive rate was higher (p=0.005) in the open biopsy group than the percutaneous needle biopsy group. 19 (70.4%) of 27 biopsy specimens were positive in the open biopsy group, and 10 (33.3%) of 30 biopsy specimens were positive in the percutaneous needle biopsy group. Furthermore, the open biopsy showed higher positive culture rate than the percutaneous needle biopsy in cases with administration of empirical antibiotics although there was no statistically significant (p=0.137). Conclusions Open biopsy should be considered for administration of organism-specific antibiotics for the successful treatment when percutaneous needle yield negative result. Furthermore, empirical antibiotics should be delayed until results of cultures unless the patient is severely septic, critically ill, neutropenic or neurologically compromised.
机译:目的本研究的目的是评估和比较开放式活检技术和经皮活检技术对腰椎病的诊断价值。方法回顾性分析2004年1月至2009年12月期间57例传染性腰椎病患者的病历。传染性脊椎炎的病因诊断可通过两种方法获得。在57例患者中,有27例患者接受了开放活检,有30例患者进行了经皮穿刺活检,包括计算机断层扫描(CT)引导和透视引导下的穿刺。所有活检均由经验丰富的两名神经外科医生和一名介入放射科医生进行。结果在57例放射学上符合脊柱感染的病例中,有29例(50.9%)活检标本呈阳性培养,而28例(49.1%)呈阴性培养。根据活检技术的类型,开放活检组的培养阳性率高于经皮穿刺活检组(p = 0.005)。开放活检组中有27份活检标本中有19份(占70.4%)为阳性,而经皮穿刺活检组中有30份活检标本中有10份(占33.3%)为阳性。此外,在使用经验性抗生素的情况下,开放活检显示的阳性培养率高于经皮穿刺活检,尽管无统计学意义(p = 0.137)。结论当经皮穿刺针阴性时,应考虑开放活检以给予有机体特异性抗生素以成功治疗。此外,除非患者严重脓毒症,重病,中性粒细胞减少或神经功能受损,否则应将经验性抗生素推迟到培养结果为止。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号