首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage: Clinical >Machine learning based hierarchical classification of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease
【24h】

Machine learning based hierarchical classification of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer's disease

机译:基于机器学习的额颞叶痴呆和阿尔茨海默氏病的分层分类

获取原文
           

摘要

BackgroundIn a clinical setting, an individual subject classification model rather than a group analysis would be more informative. Specifically, the subtlety of cortical atrophy in some frontotemporal dementia (FTD) patients and overlapping patterns of atrophy among three FTD clinical syndromes including behavioral variant FTD (bvFTD), non-fluent/agrammatic variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA), and semantic variant PPA (svPPA) give rise to the need for classification models at the individual level. In this study, we aimed to classify each individual subject into one of the diagnostic categories in a hierarchical manner by employing a machine learning-based classification method.MethodsWe recruited 143 patients with FTD, 50 patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, and 146 cognitively normal subjects. All subjects underwent a three-dimensional volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan, and cortical thickness was measured using FreeSurfer. We applied the Laplace Beltrami operator to reduce noise in the cortical thickness data and to reduce the dimension of the feature vector. Classifiers were constructed by applying both principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis to the cortical thickness data. For the hierarchical classification, we trained four classifiers using different pairs of groups: Step 1 - CN vs. FTD?+?AD, Step 2 - FTD vs. AD, Step 3 - bvFTD vs. PPA, Step 4 - svPPA vs. nfvPPA. To evaluate the classification performance for each step, we used a10-fold cross-validation approach, performed 1000 times for reliability.ResultsThe classification accuracy of the entire hierarchical classification tree was 75.8%, which was higher than that of the non-hierarchical classifier (73.0%). The classification accuracies of steps 1–4 were 86.1%, 90.8%, 86.9%, and 92.1%, respectively. Changes in the right frontotemporal area were critical for discriminating behavioral variant FTD from PPA. The left frontal lobe discriminated nfvPPA from svPPA, while the bilateral anterior temporal regions were critical for identifying svPPA.ConclusionsIn the present study, our automated classifier successfully classified FTD clinical subtypes with good to excellent accuracy. Our classifier may help clinicians diagnose FTD subtypes with subtle cortical atrophy and facilitate appropriate specific interventions.
机译:背景技术在临床环境中,单个受试者分类模型而不是分组分析会提供更多信息。具体而言,某些额颞叶痴呆(FTD)患者的皮质萎缩的微妙之处和三种FTD临床综合征(包括行为变异性FTD(bvFTD),非流利性/语法变异性原发性失语症(nfvPPA)和语义变异性PPA)之间萎缩的重叠模式(svPPA)引起了对个人级别分类模型的需求。在这项研究中,我们旨在通过使用基于机器学习的分类方法,将每个个体按分级方式分类为诊断类别之一。方法我们招募了143例FTD患者,50例阿尔茨海默氏病(AD)痴呆患者和146例患者认知正常的对象。所有受试者均进行了三维立体脑磁共振成像(MRI)扫描,并使用FreeSurfer测量了皮层厚度。我们应用了Laplace Beltrami算子来减少皮层厚度数据中的噪声并减小特征向量的维数。通过对皮层厚度数据应用主成分分析和线性判别分析来构造分类器。对于分层分类,我们使用不同的组对训练了四个分类器:步骤1-CN与FTD?+?AD,步骤2-FTD与AD,步骤3-bvFTD与PPA,步骤4-svPPA与nfvPPA 。为了评估每个步骤的分类性能,我们使用了10倍交叉验证方法,对可靠性进行了1000次执行。结果整个分层分类树的分类精度为75.8%,高于非分层分类器( 73.0%)。步骤1-4的分类精度分别为86.1%,90.8%,86.9%和92.1%。右额颞区的变化对于区分行为变异性FTD和PPA至关重要。左额叶将svPPA与nfvPPA区别开来,而双侧前颞区对于svPPA的识别至关重要。我们的分类器可以帮助临床医生诊断具有轻微皮质萎缩的FTD亚型,并促进适当的具体干预措施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号