首页> 外文期刊>Nigerian Journal of Surgery >New visual prostate symptom score versus international prostate symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: A prospective comparision in Indian rural population
【24h】

New visual prostate symptom score versus international prostate symptom score in men with lower urinary tract symptoms: A prospective comparision in Indian rural population

机译:下尿路症状男性的新视觉前列腺症状评分与国际前列腺症状评分的比较:印度农村人口的前瞻性比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction : Benign prostrate hyperplasia (BPH) is a leading source of healthcare problem in aging men around the world including India. Both International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and New Visual Prostate Symptom Score (VPSS) are used to assess the lower urinary tracts symptoms (LUTSs) in men. The present study was planned to compare these two scores, IPSS and VPSS in Indian rural men prospectively and their efficacy was compared with urodynamic evaluation of the patients. Materials and Methods : With Institutional Ethical Committee approval, this study was conducted on 100 patients having LUTS and BPH after obtaining written informed consent. Patients’ educational status was noted. All the patients were requested to complete the IPSS and VPSS questionnaire, and they were correlated. The urodynamic study was performed on all the patients with uroflowmeter. Two parameters of uroflowmetry, Qmax (maximum urine flow rate expressed in ml/s) and Qavrg (average urine flow rate expressed in ml/s) were measured and correlated. Results : Most of the patients (55%) in this study were uneducated. Out of 100 patients, 83% were able to fill the VPSS questionnaire without assistance as compared to only 40% patients in IPSS questionnaire (Z = 6.557, P Conclusion : VPSS correlates significantly with the IPSS to quantify the LUTS due to BPH. The VPSS can be used instead of the IPSS for the assessment of symptom severity in men with LUTS, who are illiterate or have limited education.
机译:简介:良性前列腺增生(BPH)是包括印度在内的世界各地老年男性医疗保健问题的主要来源。国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)和新视觉前列腺症状评分(VPSS)均用于评估男性的下尿路症状(LUTS)。本研究计划前瞻性比较印度农村男性这两个评分,即IPSS和VPSS,并将其疗效与患者的尿动力学评估进行比较。材料和方法:经机构伦理委员会批准,本研究在获得书面知情同意后对100名患有LUTS和BPH的患者进行。记录了患者的教育状况。要求所有患者填写IPSS和VPSS问卷,并进行关联。对所有使用尿流计的患者进行尿流动力学研究。尿流测定法的两个参数分别是Qmax(最大尿流率,以ml / s表示)和Qavrg(尿流率,以ml / s表示)。结果:本研究中的大多数患者(55%)未接受过教育。在100名患者中,有83%的人能够在没有帮助的情况下填写VPSS调查表,而IPSS调查表中只有40%的患者(Z = 6.557,P)结论:VPSS与IPSS显着相关,以量化由BPH引起的LUTS。可以代替IPSS来评估文盲或受教育程度有限的LUTS男性的症状严重程度。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号