首页> 外文期刊>NeuroImage: Clinical >Evaluating the effect of multiple sclerosis lesions on automatic brain structure segmentation
【24h】

Evaluating the effect of multiple sclerosis lesions on automatic brain structure segmentation

机译:评估多发性硬化症病变对自动脑结构分割的影响

获取原文
           

摘要

In recent years, many automatic brain structure segmentation methods have been proposed. However, these methods are commonly tested with non-lesioned brains and the effect of lesions on their performance has not been evaluated. Here, we analyze the effect of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions on three well-known automatic brain structure segmentation methods, namely, FreeSurfer, FIRST and multi-atlas fused by majority voting, which use learning-based, deformable and atlas-based strategies, respectively. To perform a quantitative analysis, 100 synthetic images of MS patients with a total of 2174 lesions are simulated on two public databases with available brain structure ground truth information (IBSR18 and MICCAI’12). The Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) differences and the volume differences between the healthy and the simulated images are calculated for the subcortical structures and the brainstem. We observe that the three strategies are affected when lesions are present. However, the effects of the lesions do not follow the same pattern; the lesions either make the segmentation method underperform or surprisingly augment the segmentation accuracy. The obtained results show that FreeSurfer is the method most affected by the presence of lesions, with DSC differences (generated ? healthy) ranging from ? 0.11 ± 0.54 to 9.65 ± 9.87, whereas FIRST tends to be the most robust method when lesions are present (? 2.40 ± 5.54 to 0.44 ± 0.94). Lesion location is not important for global strategies such as FreeSurfer or majority voting, where structure segmentation is affected wherever the lesions exist. On the other hand, FIRST is more affected when the lesions are overlaid or close to the structure of analysis. The most affected structure by the presence of lesions is the nucleus accumbens (from ? 1.12 ± 2.53 to 1.32 ± 4.00 for the left hemisphere and from ? 2.40 ± 5.54 to 9.65 ± 9.87 for the right hemisphere), whereas the structures that show less variation include the thalamus (from 0.03 ± 0.35 to 0.74 ± 0.89 and from ? 0.48 ± 1.08 to ? 0.04 ± 0.22) and the brainstem (from ? 0.20 ± 0.38 to 1.03 ± 1.31). The three segmentation approaches are affected by the presence of MS lesions, which demonstrates that there exists a problem in the automatic segmentation methods of the deep gray matter (DGM) structures that has to be taken into account when using them as a tool to measure the disease progression. Highlights ? We analyze the effect of MS lesions on automatic brain structure segmentation. ? We simulate MS lesions on 2 databases of healthy subjects with structures ground truth. ? The effect of the lesions in FreeSurfer, FIRST and majority voting is evaluated. ? FreeSurfer is the most affected method whereas FIRST is the most robust.
机译:近年来,已经提出了许多自动脑结构分割方法。但是,这些方法通常是用非病变大脑测试的,尚未评估病变对其性能的影响。在这里,我们分析多发性硬化(MS)病变对三种著名的自动脑结构分割方法,即FreeSurfer,FIRST和多数投票融合的多图集的影响,这些方法使用基于学习,可变形和基于图集的策略, 分别。为了进行定量分析,在两个具有可用的大脑结构基础真相信息的公共数据库(IBSR18和MICCAI'12)上模拟了100个MS患者的合成图像,总共2174个病变。计算皮质下结构和脑干的健康和模拟图像之间的骰子相似性系数(DSC)差异和体积差异。我们观察到,当存在病变时,这三种策略都会受到影响。但是,病变的影响方式不同。病变要么使分割方法表现不佳,要么出人意料地提高了分割精度。获得的结果表明,FreeSurfer是受病灶存在影响最大的方法,DSC差异(产生的“健康”)范围为? 0.11±0.54至9.65±9.87,而当存在病灶时(?2.40±5.54至0.44±0.94)FIRST往往是最可靠的方法。对于诸如FreeSurfer或多数表决之类的全局策略而言,病变的位置并不重要,因为无论病变存在于何处,结构分割都会受到影响。另一方面,当病变覆盖或接近分析结构时,FIRST受到的影响更大。受病变影响最大的结构是伏隔核(左半球从?1.12±2.53至1.32±4.00,右半球从?2.40±5.54至9.65±9.87),而变化较小的结构包括丘脑(从0.03±0.35到0.74±0.89,从?0.48±1.08到?0.04±0.22)和脑干(从±0.20±0.38到1.03±1.31)。三种分割方法受MS病变的存在影响,这表明在深灰质(DGM)结构的自动分割方法中存在一个问题,在使用它们作为测量工具的工具时必须予以考虑。疾病进展。强调 ?我们分析了MS病变对自动脑结构分割的影响。 ?我们在具有结构基础的健康受试者的2个数据库上模拟MS病变。 ?评估病变在FreeSurfer,FIRST和多数表决中的作用。 ? FreeSurfer是受影响最大的方法,而FIRST是最可靠的方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号