首页> 外文期刊>Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment >Confirmation of the factorial structure of the Japanese short version of the TEMPS-A in psychiatric patients and general adults
【24h】

Confirmation of the factorial structure of the Japanese short version of the TEMPS-A in psychiatric patients and general adults

机译:精神病患者和普通成年人中日本短版TEMPS-A析因结构的确认

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The Temperament Evaluation of the Memphis, Pisa, Paris, and San Diego Auto-questionnaire (TEMPS-A) is a 110-item questionnaire that assesses five affective temperaments. However, a valid shortened version is desired for large-scale investigations to enhance the compliance of respondents. Methods: A confirmatory factor analysis was conducted among 320 psychiatric patients and 61 general adults. The participants completed the Japanese 39-item short version of the TEMPS-A, and a portion of the participants completed the 110-item version. An exploratory factor analysis with the principal factor method and varimax rotation was conducted to identify a more suitable model of the short version of the TEMPS-A. Results: The confirmatory factor analysis revealed that the 39-item version exhibited a poor model fit. However, we found that the 18-item version exhibited a firm five-factor structure based on the exploratory factor analysis, and this model exhibited an acceptable model fit. It had good or acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach’s α s: 0.672–0.819). Limitations: The majority of the subjects in the present study were patients, and the temperament data may have been affected by psychiatric symptoms. Conclusion: A firm five-factor structure was not found in the 39-item short version of the Japanese TEMPS-A. Therefore, an 18-item version was proposed. This new 18-item version of the TEMPS-A might be useful for clinical applications and large-scale investigations.
机译:背景:孟菲斯,比萨,巴黎和圣地亚哥自动调查问卷(TEMPS-A)的气质评估是一项110项问卷,评估了五个情感气质。但是,大型调查需要有效的缩短版本,以提高受访者的依从性。方法:对320名精神病患者和61名普通成年人进行了验证性因素分析。参加者完成了TEMPS-A的日语39项短版,部分参加者完成了110项版。使用主因子方法和varimax旋转进行了探索性因子分析,以确定更合适的TEMPS-A短版模型。结果:验证性因素分析显示,39个项目的模型拟合度较差。但是,根据探索性因素分析,我们发现18个项目的版本显示出牢固的五因素结构,并且该模型显示出可接受的模型拟合。它具有良好或可接受的内部一致性(Cronbach的αs:0.672–0.819)。局限性:本研究中的大多数受试者为患者,气质数据可能已受到精神症状的影响。结论:在日本TEMPS-A的39件短版中未发现牢固的五因素结构。因此,提出了18个项目的版本。 TEMPS-A的这一新的18个项目版本可能对临床应用和大规模研究有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号