...
首页> 外文期刊>Natural Resources >Predator-Proof Bomas as a Tool in Mitigating Human-Predator Conflict in Loitokitok Sub-County Amboseli Region of Kenya
【24h】

Predator-Proof Bomas as a Tool in Mitigating Human-Predator Conflict in Loitokitok Sub-County Amboseli Region of Kenya

机译:肯尼亚的Loitokitok县安博塞利地区的掠食者安全避难所作为缓解人类与食肉动物冲突的工具

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Human-wildlife conflict (HWC) arises when wildlife shares the same physical space with humans. HWC, particularly livestock predation results in great negative impacts both to pastoralist and carnivores. Various approaches including compensation, livestock guarding, translocation of the problematic predator, and predator-proof bomas (PPB) have been used to mitigate such conflicts. We assessed PPB in mitigating human-predator conflict in Loitokitok sub-county by focusing on its effectiveness, most problematic predator, community’s perceptions, and comparing the PPB and traditional bomas characteristics. Data were obtained from 90 homesteads in Olgulului, Mbirikani and Kimana/Tikondo group ranches. Correlation and paired t-tests were used to analyze the data. Our findings suggest that the boma sizes correlated with the total number of livestock in the boma (r = 0.386, n = 90, p = 0.000) but not the number of people. Hyena and lion accounted for the highest loss of shoats and cattle, with hyena mostly killing shoats (37%) and lions preying largely on cattle (34%). The most problematic predator was as hyena (68%). We found positive relationships between the most problematic predator and total number of livestock (r = 0.319, n = 90, p = 0.002), and boma circumference (r = 0.295, n = 90, p = 0.005). Livestock predation was high in boma during the wet seasons (April, September, October and December). The erection of PPB reduced livestock predation by 91.11% (n = 45) and time spend guarding livestock at night. We recommend a continuous maintenance of the PPB as a long term solution to livestock loss at night and a close guarding of livestock during the day by adults to reduce day time predations.
机译:当野生生物与人类共享相同的物理空间时,就会发生人与野生生物冲突(HWC)。 HWC,尤其是牲畜的捕食对牧民和食肉动物都产生了很大的负面影响。包括补偿,牲畜保护,有问题的捕食者易位和防捕食性放牧(PPB)在内的各种方法已被用来缓解这种冲突。我们通过重点关注PPB的有效性,最有问题的捕食者,社区的看法,并比较了PPB和传统的肉食动物特征,评估了PPB在缓解Loitokitok县人类与食肉动物之间的冲突的能力。数据来自Olgulului,Mbirikani和Kimana / Tikondo组牧场的90个宅基地。相关和配对t检验用于分析数据。我们的发现表明,胎体的大小与胎体中的牲畜总数相关(r = 0.386,n = 90,p = 0.000),而不是人数。鬣狗和狮子造成的损失最多的是猪和牛,鬣狗主要杀死猪(37%),狮子主要捕食牛(34%)。最有问题的捕食者是鬣狗(68%)。我们发现问题最严重的捕食者与牲畜总数(r = 0.319,n = 90,p = 0.002)和鲍马周长(r = 0.295,n = 90,p = 0.005)之间存在正相关关系。在雨季(4月,9月,10月和12月),鲍马的牲畜捕食活动很高。 PPB的安装使牲畜的捕食减少了91.11%(n = 45),并在夜间花费了更多时间保护牲畜。我们建议对PPB进行连续维护,以解决夜间牲畜流失的长期解决方案,并建议成年人在白天密切保护牲畜,以减少白天的捕食活动。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号