首页> 外文期刊>Nefrologia >Prospective evaluation of the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing rotational coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography: CINERAMA study
【24h】

Prospective evaluation of the development of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing rotational coronary angiography vs. conventional coronary angiography: CINERAMA study

机译:急性冠脉综合征患者接受旋转冠状动脉造影与常规冠状动脉造影的对比性肾病发展的前瞻性评估:CINERAMA研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction and objectives Rotational coronary angiography (RCA) requires less contrast to be administered and can prevent the onset of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) during invasive coronary procedures. The aim of the study is to evaluate the impact of RCA on CIN (increase in serum creatinine ≥0.5mg/dL or ≥25%) after an acute coronary syndrome. Methods From April to September 2016, patients suffering acute coronary syndromes who underwent diagnostic coronary angiography, with the possibility of ad hoc coronary angioplasty, were prospectively enrolled. At the operator's discretion, patients underwent RCA or conventional coronary angiography (CCA). CIN (primary endpoint), as well as analytical, angiographic and clinical endpoints, were compared between groups. Results Of the 235 patients enrolled, 116 patients received RCA and 119 patients received CCA. The RCA group was composed of older patients (64.0±11.8 years vs. 59.7±12.1 years; p =0.006), a higher proportion of women (44.8 vs. 17.6%; p <0.001), patients with a lower estimated glomerular filtration rate (76±25 vs. 86±27ml/min/1.73m 2 ; p =0.001), and patients who underwent fewer coronary angioplasties ( p <0.001) compared with the CCA group. Furthermore, the RCA group, received less contrast (113±92 vs. 169±103ml; p <0.001), including in diagnostic procedures (54±24 vs. 85±56ml; p <0.001) and diagnostic-therapeutic procedures (174±64 vs. 205±98ml; p =0.049) compared with the CCA group. The RCA group presented less CIN (4.3 vs. 22.7%; p <0.001) compared to the CCA group, and this finding was maintained in the regression analysis (Adjusted relative risk: 0.868; 95% CI: 0.794–0.949; p =0.002). There were no differences in clinical endpoints between the groups. Conclusions RCA was associated with lower administration of contrast during invasive coronary procedures in acute coronary syndrome patients, resulting in lower incidence of CIN, in comparison with CCA.
机译:简介和目的旋转冠状动脉造影(RCA)需要进行的造影剂较少,并且可以在有创冠状动脉手术期间防止造影剂诱发的肾病(CIN)发作。这项研究的目的是评估RCA对急性冠脉综合征后CIN(血清肌酐增加≥0.5mg/ dL或≥25%)的影响。方法2016年4月至2016年9月,对接受急性冠状动脉综合征的患者进行了诊断性冠状动脉造影,并可能进行临时性冠状动脉成形术。根据操作员的判断,患者应进行RCA或常规冠状动脉造影(CCA)。比较各组之间的CIN(主要终点)以及分析,血管造影和临床终点。结果纳入的235例患者中,有116例接受了RCA,119例接受了CCA。 RCA组由年龄较大的患者(64.0±11.8岁vs. 59.7±12.1岁; p = 0.006),女性比例较高(44.8 vs. 17.6%; p <0.001),估计肾小球滤过率较低的患者组成(76±25 vs. 86±27ml / min / 1.73m 2; p = 0.001),与CCA组相比,冠状动脉成形术较少的患者(p <0.001)。此外,RCA组的造影剂对比度较低(113±92 vs. 169±103ml; p <0.001),包括诊断程序(54±24 vs. 85±56ml; p <0.001)和诊断治疗程序(174±与CCA组相比,分别为64 vs. 205±98ml; p = 0.049)。与CCA组相比,RCA组的CIN较少(4.3 vs. 22.7%; p <0.001),这一发现在回归分析中得以保持(校正相对风险:0.868; 95%CI:0.794-0.949; p = 0.002) )。两组之间的临床终点没有差异。结论与急性冠脉综合征相比,急性冠脉综合征患者在侵入性冠脉手术过程中RCA的造影剂给药率较低,从而导致CIN的发生率较低。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号