首页> 外文期刊>Nagoya journal of medical science >Comparison between rectus sheath block with 0.25% ropivacaine and local anesthetic infiltration with 0.5% ropivacaine for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children
【24h】

Comparison between rectus sheath block with 0.25% ropivacaine and local anesthetic infiltration with 0.5% ropivacaine for laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair in children

机译:小儿腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术中0.25%罗哌卡因的直肌鞘阻滞与0.5%罗哌卡因的局部麻醉药浸润的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

This randomized, observer-blinded prospective study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block with those of local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical field in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Children aged 2 to 14 years, scheduled for elective single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure, were randomly allocated to receive ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block (group R) or local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical field (group L). In group R, 0.5 ml/kg of 0.25% ropivacaine (per side) was administered after intubation. In group L, 0.4 ml/kg of 0.5% ropivacaine was administered after peritoneal closure. Postoperative pain was assessed using the Face Scale and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale at various time points, including the primary endpoint of 2 h after leaving the operation room. Additional analgesic drugs were used according to the Face Scale scores. Patient characteristics, the amount of additional drugs, and complication rate were evaluated in both groups. The patient and surgical characteristics were comparable between groups. The Face Scale and Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability scale scores were not significantly different between group R (n = 38) and group L (n = 38) at 2 h after leaving the operation room. The amount of additional drugs administered at 2 h after leaving the operation room were also comparable between groups. Our findings suggest that the postoperative analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rectus sheath block is not superior to that of local anesthetic infiltration of the surgical field for pediatric single-incision laparoscopic percutaneous extraperitoneal closure.
机译:这项随机,观察者双盲的前瞻性研究旨在比较腹股沟疝修补术患儿超声引导的直肌鞘管阻滞与手术区域局部麻醉药浸润的镇痛效果。计划进行择期单切口腹腔镜经皮腹膜外闭合手术的2至14岁儿童被随机分配接受超声引导的直肌鞘膜阻滞(R组)或手术区域的局部麻醉药浸润(L组)。在R组中,插管后给予0.5 ml / kg的0.25%罗哌卡因(每侧)。在L组中,腹膜封闭后给予0.4 ml / kg的0.5%罗哌卡因。在不同时间点,包括离开手术室后2 h的主要终点,使用面部量表和面部,腿部,活动,哭泣,舒适度量表评估术后疼痛。根据Face Scale评分使用其他镇痛药。两组均评估了患者的特征,其他药物的用量和并发症发生率。两组之间的患者和手术特征相当。 R组(n = 38)和L组(n = 38)在离开手术室2小时后的面部表情和面部,腿部,活动,哭泣,舒适度评分得分没有显着差异。两组患者离开手术室后2小时服用的其他药物数量也相当。我们的发现表明,对于小切口单切口腹腔镜经皮腹膜外闭合术,超声引导的直肌鞘管阻滞的术后镇痛效果并不优于手术区域的局部麻醉药浸润效果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号